Graphics, gone to hell? Options

[Gypsy Eyes]

Sorry if I sound like a broken record but what is happening to the graphics? The quality is decreasing and it looks like some of the mods (not saying any names) aren't reading the submission rules or guidelines. Just looking through the first two pages I can see four of five graphics that are either poor quality or go against the rules. Wasn't the whole point of having a queue to weed out the bad graphics?

[Mulder]

while I agree that moderators should be... punished if they dont "step it up" I dont think there should be set "warnings" or levels. Trust the other mods and heads/admins to decide what's best, not turn it to the community, or automatically follow some pre-planned rule. besides, if some mod keeps accepting substandard graphics, they probably would stop going into the queue at all.

And I meant that confronting the mods in question should be done backstage.

[*mzkandi*]

while I agree that moderators should be... punished if they dont "step it up" I dont think there should be set "warnings" or levels. Trust the other mods and heads/admins to decide what's best, not turn it to the community, or automatically follow some pre-planned rule. besides, if some mod keeps accepting substandard graphics, they probably would stop going into the queue at all.

And I meant that confronting the mods in question should be done backstage.

The thing is, those in question shouldn't have to simply stop going into the queue because they accept sub-standard work. That isn't what you're hired for. The queue, as you know, builds up fast and everyone should be doing their part to clear it. I support there being more communication for such violations as continuing to accept substandard work. Right now, demotion sounds harsh to me. I believe more communication would help solve this. As I stated before, yes, our tastes are different, but one can train their eye for good design by being objective with each submitted work.