Graphics, gone to hell? Options

[Gypsy Eyes]

Sorry if I sound like a broken record but what is happening to the graphics? The quality is decreasing and it looks like some of the mods (not saying any names) aren't reading the submission rules or guidelines. Just looking through the first two pages I can see four of five graphics that are either poor quality or go against the rules. Wasn't the whole point of having a queue to weed out the bad graphics?

[radhikaeatsraman]

^But that's exactly the attitude some cB design mods have. Maybe if we eliminate the process of house cleaning altogether and find some way to make the design mods step it up, then we won't have to go through it (house cleaning, that is).
A sample consequence system could go as follows:

-If a mod is found to have accepted five or more graphics that don't meet or exceed each standard, a warning goes out to them via PM to remove those items from their queue. If they do not remove the items, the next level of action is taken.
-Ten or more items, their accept/reject privileges are revoked for a period of time. (One week?)
-If the offenses repeat after this, they are demodded and do not get to re-apply during the next hiring session.

Members or other mods could report these offenses via PM to Head Staff or Admin or post in the Feedback section, but they must cite the posted graphics standards in order for the graphic to be considered for removal. "This looks soooo bad" should not be a good reason for removal.

Also, if a mod wants to challenge the warnings/suspensions, they may do so by citing the graphics standards and showing how each substandard graphic is, in fact, not so. If they cannot prove that the said graphics are at or above cB standards, the consequences will stand.