MOD WARNING SYSTEM Options

[*kryogenix*]

I have been a victim of moderator abuse TWICE (three times if you count the one I'm bringing up about the cosplay thread) now only recently.

I think there should be a mod warning system in place, where users can vote against a moderator's action and then once they abuse their powers to a certain point, they get kicked off the team.

Cause I'm sick of it.

[*mona lisa*]

I don't think a mod warning system is going to be useful. Things shouldn't be made any more complicated than they have to be.

I agree that modifying rules (such as controversy, spamming, pointless topics, trolling...) to make them clearer would be better. It isn't a problem of anyone having a 'vendetta' against others; it's just different views on how to carry out/enforce rules.

[*kryogenix*]

I don't think a mod warning system is going to be useful. Things shouldn't be made any more complicated than they have to be.

I agree that modifying rules (such as controversy, spamming, pointless topics, trolling...) to make them clearer would be better. It isn't a problem of anyone having a 'vendetta' against others; it's just different views on how to carry out/enforce rules.

Even when they're consistently wrong on how they enforce the rules?

[viugiufgjhfhjfhg...]

Even when they're consistently wrong on how they enforce the rules?

There always will be human errors, although with better tools and practical experience the number and significance of said mistakes can be lessened.

And by the way, the "errors" we're talking about here are pretty tame keeping the whole lot of possibilities in mind. Which doesn't mean they shouldn't be dealt with, though. Was just stating the obvious, kinda.

[*kryogenix*]

There always will be human errors, although with better tools and practical experience the number and significance of said mistakes can be lessened.

And by the way, the "errors" we're talking about here are pretty tame keeping the whole lot of possibilities in mind. Which doesn't mean they shouldn't be dealt with, though. Was just stating the obvious, kinda.

We have a wrongdoing (three actually). We have a motive. I dunno, it just adds up to me. What's the coincidence that someone makes three mistakes in such a short period time involving the same person?

And if this person is so error prone, why are they on staff?

[viugiufgjhfhjfhg...]

We have a wrongdoing (three actually). We have a motive. I dunno, it just adds up to me. What's the coincidence that someone makes three mistakes in such a short period time involving the same person?

And if this person is so error prone, why are they on staff?

Depends on what the person found on the receiving end is doing, also mostly. Also on how it's being done, when and why.

As far as mod statistics go, I haven't really been enough to notice consistent misdoing on the staff's side. Then again, I am not around too much.