Graphics, gone to hell? |
 Apr 26 2007, 03:21 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051  |
Sorry if I sound like a broken record but what is happening to the graphics? The quality is decreasing and it looks like some of the mods (not saying any names) aren't reading the submission rules or guidelines. Just looking through the first two pages I can see four of five graphics that are either poor quality or go against the rules. Wasn't the whole point of having a queue to weed out the bad graphics?
|
|
|
|
 |
Replies
|
Apr 28 2007, 09:03 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
t-t-t-toyaaa Group: Official Member Posts: 19,821 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 11,270 |
QUOTE(Gypsy Eyes @ Apr 26 2007, 6:48 PM)  Are these going to be removed? I'll be going through it in a second. Even though she edited them, the photos still shouldn't have been accepted (as photos) in the first place since she didn't take them. QUOTE(rawtheekuh. @ Apr 28 2007, 4:37 PM) http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php...=146495&hl= I was told almost a year ago that this topic would be addressed and it still hasn't. We need to make the design staff realize this fact. I say if too many bad graphics get through certain queues, we penalize the mods responsible for those queues. So basically you want which ever mod is accepting bad graphics to not be able to accept graphics for a certain period of time? That wouldn't really work out too well. How exactly would that particular person learn from that experience. Its one thing to point out who accepted it and then possibly explain why it shouldn't have been accepted , but if your goal was to prohibit them from accepting , then why are they really on staff. Yes being on staff requires for you to spend some time in the forums, etc, but also being apart of the acceptance/rejection process is too. So I don't really understand what you mean by penalize them? |
|
|
|
|
Apr 29 2007, 09:58 AM
Post
#3
|
|
 oooh yeah. Group: Member Posts: 1,333 Joined: Feb 2006 Member No: 376,533 |
QUOTE(toyo loco) I'll be going through it in a second. Even though she edited them, the photos still shouldn't have been accepted (as photos) in the first place since she didn't take them. So basically you want which ever mod is accepting bad graphics to not be able to accept graphics for a certain period of time? That wouldn't really work out too well. How exactly would that particular person learn from that experience. Its one thing to point out who accepted it and then possibly explain why it shouldn't have been accepted , but if your goal was to prohibit them from accepting , then why are they really on staff. Yes being on staff requires for you to spend some time in the forums, etc, but also being apart of the acceptance/rejection process is too. So I don't really understand what you mean by penalize them? We shouldn't have to complain multiple times in order for something to get done. If not letting them accept/reject graphics for a period of time will get them to realize that they need to step it up, then okay. And if it continues to happen? Demote them. cB members are looking for accountability from the mods. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Gypsy Eyes Graphics Apr 26 2007, 03:21 PM
Duchess of Dork ^ Absolutely.
Would you feel really put on the ... Apr 26 2007, 03:31 PM Gypsy Eyes That is a good idea. No problem with examples, I j... Apr 26 2007, 03:38 PM digital.fragrance I was about to add one, but I just realized that t... Apr 26 2007, 04:46 PM create yourself Jackie, at least your bringing it to their attenti... Apr 26 2007, 08:14 PM
digital.fragrance QUOTE(create yourself @ Apr 26 2007, 9:14... Apr 26 2007, 08:27 PM Gypsy Eyes ^
QUOTE-No personal pictures. Keep in mind these p... Apr 26 2007, 08:19 PM create yourself ^Thank you
I was working my way there
Star ha... Apr 26 2007, 08:23 PM Gypsy Eyes ^yes you can. it says "last edited by...... Apr 26 2007, 08:28 PM digital.fragrance QUOTE(Gypsy Eyes @ Apr 26 2007, 9:28 PM) ... Apr 26 2007, 08:31 PM moorepocket* i keep a look out for these when accepting. Apr 26 2007, 08:29 PM create yourself ^wow, yea its been like that forever. And usually ... Apr 26 2007, 08:30 PM Gypsy Eyes QUOTE(create yourself @ Apr 26 2007, 9:30... Apr 26 2007, 08:48 PM Gypsy Eyes ^x2
yeah you always have
Wait she didn't tak... Apr 26 2007, 08:30 PM create yourself ^ You've been on staff for how long Rachael? ... Apr 26 2007, 08:32 PM digital.fragrance ... About... 1 1/2 month blip, and then counting n... Apr 26 2007, 08:34 PM create yourself ^I would hope so, I suppose we should give them so... Apr 26 2007, 08:49 PM Gypsy Eyes Oh it wasn't meant to sound like that. sorry. Apr 26 2007, 08:50 PM create yourself No need for apologizing, I just took it the wrong ... Apr 26 2007, 08:52 PM My Cinderella. *twitch* Oh man, I see what you mean. I only caugh... Apr 28 2007, 05:30 PM rawtheekuh. http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php...=1464... Apr 28 2007, 06:37 PM Spiritual Winged Aura Had we not discussed this already?
Did moderator... Apr 28 2007, 11:25 PM mzkandi I've often thought about what disciplinary act... Apr 29 2007, 11:17 AM rawtheekuh. ^But that's exactly the attitude some cB desig... May 1 2007, 07:44 PM Mulder I think thats unnecessary.
We were modded because... May 1 2007, 07:54 PM rawtheekuh. QUOTE(Mulder @ May 1 2007, 7:54 PM) I thi... May 1 2007, 08:37 PM Mulder while I agree that moderators should be... punishe... May 1 2007, 10:20 PM mzkandi QUOTE(Mulder @ May 1 2007, 11:20 PM) whil... May 2 2007, 04:28 PM rawtheekuh. ^Hm. Well, maybe instead of making a topic saying,... May 2 2007, 04:14 PM Duchess of Dork Demotion does seem harsh, at first glance. Howeve... May 3 2007, 11:37 AM Gypsy Eyes I think a demotion might be harsh, maybe suspended... May 3 2007, 03:34 PM digital.fragrance ^ We've began disuccsing specific standards, a... May 3 2007, 03:39 PM rawtheekuh. ^How soon? In a week? In a month? A year? Never? A... May 3 2007, 07:50 PM Duchess of Dork QUOTE(rawtheekuh. @ May 3 2007, 8:50 PM) ... May 4 2007, 07:51 AM digital.fragrance ^ They won't be posted generally - they will p... May 3 2007, 08:41 PM Gypsy Eyes There has been a major improvement in quality
Bu... May 8 2007, 05:15 PM Intercourse. Well I don't know if anyone ever noticed but g... May 10 2007, 03:59 PM StanleyThePanda ^ I was a little iffy about rejecting it (I'm ... May 10 2007, 11:05 PM Intercourse. Thanks Kara.
This user -
http://www.createblog.co... May 11 2007, 10:41 PM kimmytree Yeah, the photography section has really declined.... May 12 2007, 08:54 AM Intercourse. ^Yea, I've noticed it as well. Also theres a b... May 12 2007, 09:20 AM Spirited Away No punishment needed.
How about a panel of judge... May 12 2007, 09:25 AM kimmytree QUOTE(Spirited Away @ May 12 2007, 10:25 ... May 12 2007, 04:52 PM Sherlock. QUOTE(kimmytree @ May 12 2007, 3:52 PM) M... May 12 2007, 05:37 PM Intercourse. QUOTE(kimmytree @ May 12 2007, 5:52 PM) M... May 12 2007, 06:01 PM Intercourse. ^thats kind of like the idea Jusun had a while bac... May 12 2007, 09:39 AM Spirited Away That sounds complicated. I think only staff should... May 12 2007, 10:06 AM Intercourse. Yea it was really complicated thats why it was kin... May 12 2007, 10:15 AM tic tac. ^ I thought they do write letters explaining the r... May 12 2007, 10:29 AM Intercourse. ^nah I think they just ask you if you had to write... May 12 2007, 10:37 AM tic tac. Were you referring to the interviews or the curren... May 12 2007, 10:42 AM Intercourse. No when there is a hiring session and when you get... May 12 2007, 10:52 AM tic tac. Ah, okay.
I think they should do that now with th... May 12 2007, 10:54 AM Gypsy Eyes Holly that's a really good idea, thought ten m... May 12 2007, 03:47 PM Intercourse. ^Oh man, that is really bad!
I think that re... May 12 2007, 04:05 PM .misoshiru QUOTE(Intercourse. @ May 13 2007, 5:05 AM... May 12 2007, 04:41 PM toyo loco QUOTE(Intercourse. @ May 12 2007, 2:05 PM... May 12 2007, 05:06 PM kimmytree ^ That's true, but the group of staff could be... May 12 2007, 05:57 PM Sherlock. A committee would be pretty senseless. Sorry, I ju... May 12 2007, 10:20 PM Gypsy Eyes QUOTE(Sherlock. @ May 12 2007, 11:20 PM) ... May 13 2007, 11:34 AM rawtheekuh. I don't think anyone has brought this up, but ... May 12 2007, 10:29 PM Sherlock. They have been removed. You can still view them th... May 12 2007, 10:33 PM rawtheekuh. Ohh, okay. May 13 2007, 11:21 AM Intercourse. Or are you saying the staff isn't hiring quali... May 13 2007, 08:20 PM Gypsy Eyes Not so much that, they might be qualified as far a... May 13 2007, 08:41 PM Intercourse. I hate to say this and get in the middle of everyt... May 13 2007, 10:51 PM Gypsy Eyes Sorry about being a pain in the ass
http://www.cr... May 14 2007, 10:48 PM kryogenix Yeah, cB is really going down the drain. May 14 2007, 10:57 PM Gypsy Eyes ^haha that was an expected comment.
Why is everyt... May 15 2007, 07:10 PM Intercourse. ^I don't think their going to bother deleting ... May 15 2007, 07:17 PM freeflow QUOTE(Intercourse. @ May 15 2007, 5:17 PM... May 15 2007, 08:02 PM Gypsy Eyes Eh, whatever. It's just going to lead to a gia... May 15 2007, 07:27 PM rawtheekuh. I think as much as it would reflect poorly on the ... May 16 2007, 03:11 PM Intercourse. ^yea although to sadly say it. Its never going to ... May 16 2007, 03:16 PM StanleyThePanda ^ Yes, its going to be the same staff. But after t... May 17 2007, 12:48 AM Gypsy Eyes Wasn't that the point of the first house clean... May 17 2007, 03:22 PM freeflow QUOTE(Gypsy Eyes @ May 17 2007, 1:22 PM) ... May 17 2007, 10:56 PM Intercourse. Alright well I agree with Jackie but its nice to h... May 17 2007, 03:25 PM Gypsy Eyes Sorry that last post wasn't supposed to come o... May 17 2007, 10:32 PM Gypsy Eyes What I don't understand is if you are not reje... May 19 2007, 08:32 PM freeflow Why not PM and ask the person that rejected it ? I... May 19 2007, 08:40 PM niez_cho This graphic should be rejected:
http://www.creat... May 20 2007, 10:01 PM oh_flardnarf Why? May 20 2007, 10:02 PM Azarel So on a whim, I clicked on avatars/icons and I hav... May 24 2007, 02:00 PM niez_cho Kristina: Well... I just don't think that phot... May 25 2007, 04:14 AM oh_flardnarf No offense, but thats not a real good reason. It... May 26 2007, 05:32 PM gelionie ^ it's okay. Just my opinion. May 27 2007, 06:10 AM immavietgirl i think its okay too. May 28 2007, 08:32 PM Gypsy Eyes Yeah um what?
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/c... May 31 2007, 02:35 PM superstitious Thing is, Jackie, that although the first one look... Jun 1 2007, 06:45 AM digitalfragrance QUOTE(superstitious @ Jun 1 2007, 07:45 A... Jun 1 2007, 08:46 AM Gypsy Eyes ^it's not even the gaussian blur. It's the... Jun 1 2007, 03:15 PM digitalfragrance ^ But if you look at the text quality of the banne... Jun 1 2007, 09:05 PM SinfullySweet Well, in this layout
http://www.createblog.com/la... Jun 15 2007, 05:49 PM falsetigerlimbs QUOTE(SinfullySweet @ Jun 15 2007, 03:49 ... Jun 17 2007, 02:28 AM SayBloodyMary ^ Well as far as needing more of a certain type of... Jun 17 2007, 05:50 AM SinfullySweet QUOTE(SayBloodyMary @ Jun 17 2007, 05:50 ... Jun 17 2007, 11:36 AM mzkandi Although, it doesn't suit my taste, the layout... Jun 17 2007, 04:27 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: