STRANGE NEWS ABOUT VTECH SHOOTINGS, Possible conspiracy? Options

[*Podomaht*]

Now, before you guys go ahead and say shit about how I'm an idiot, read the stuff. I'm not saying CSH didn't do it, but pretty interesting facts.


( even though it sounds like some 34 year old living with his parents made this up. )

The Following are FACTS

1. In order to shoot 2 to 3 shots with both guns in the hand accurately, the person must be a professional (Colombine incident included 2 people,3guns,900 shots=13 deaths)

CSH(Cho Seung Hee) was never trained in the army.
If you have shot a gun before, you would know it is hard to fire a pistol so accurately, in so quick time.

CSH had only bought the guns a month before the shooting. How is it possible for him to shoot so good?

2. Emily, reported to be his girlfriend, is actually not his girlfriend.

3. Emily was not related with CSH in any way, but he went to her dormitory and shot it up.

4. CSH's body had 2 shots in the chest, 1 in the head.
There are 3 common ways of suicidal with gun:
1)shooting from the side of the head
2)shooting throught your mouth
3)Shooting from under your head

The usual suicidal would usually have shots in the sideof the head or the face. CSH, however, had a bullet stuck in the back of his head

Most people who were fired at, got 3 shots. CSH, also was found with 3 shots in his body

There was once a scientific experiment for the Korean army incident- It explained that it is extremely hard to shoot yourself multiple times after being shot in the chest or the head. Again, CSH had 1 shot in the head, 2 shots in the chest.

Why was he shot 3 times, just like the others? Does it make sense that he was shot in such a way?

5. There was no witness to the sucidal scene- The survivors in the scene had ran out of the classroom (someone said the killer's eyes were not Asian but these kinds of sayings were ignored).

What's the truth?

6. Nobody saw CSH's face.

7. The witness's say CSH was an asian with a mask on, and was about 6 ft tall and big.

8. The gun vender described CSH as an Asian. period.
There was no films of CCTV, and no other evidence.

9. The vender said he had sold 50 bullets to CSH.
There were 62 deaths and injuries.
There was no one who died was shot less than 3 times
(32 deaths x 3 shots/death....30 injuries x 2 shots/injury...60 extra bullets)

Calculated, CSH must have had more than 200 shots to make this incident true.

10. The killer had erased the code on the gun. The reciept for the purchase of the gun was found in the killer's bag. What's the possibility of the killer keeping the receipt for the gun after a month?
If anyone would take effort and time to erase the code on the gun, wouldn't they be careful enough to get rid of the receipt?(It's not easy to erase the code. It takes few seconds to get rid of the receipt)

11. The witnessess say the killer did not wear, nor carry any bags. CSH did have a bag.

12. Obviously, the video he had sent, was not made by himself. Even the New York Times pointed this out.

13. According to the Police, the gun at the incident was automatic. Watch the videos and hear the sounds- It's all fired with single shot guns.

Think about it. There are about 10-15 rounds in a pistol, and there were 32 deaths, with 3 shots in each. With both pistols in both hands, it is impossible to reload. Watch the video, shots are constantly fired.

14. CSH had no friends at all, according to the student. Before few days of the incident, he was with 3 Americans. Who were they?

15. In the news, CSH had done this for the hate of the rich people. If this is true, he could have simply shot the classrooms. There was no reason for him to go to the dormitories and kill 2 people, who were not in any relation with CSH.

And why did CSH, after the first shootings, make the video, walk around the school to send it, and then go to the 2nd shootings?

16. When CSH's body was found. His ID was PRESENT. Why was his identity reported later on?

17. The Witness' sayings are not matching correctly. Some say they have not heard any gunfire in their building, but other say they heard it from that building.

18. The photos which were sent to NBC does not match CSH's face.
Observing the eyebrows, eyes, and the face shape, it is different. Some say it's because he has his glasses off. Look again, it does not match CSH.

19. CSH's body was found with the 28 dead bodies in the classroom. The only survivor said, the killer had ran away after killing the 28 people, but CSH was found dead with the other dead bodies

20. The classroom, dormitory, hallways, school gate, the gunshop.
The films of the CCTV were NOT exposed to the public. WHY?


So What's wrong with the reports/news?

-CCTV
-2 guns/amature, yet many students died and many were injured as a professional shooter would have done it
-According to the witness, CSH had apparently left the classroom
-CSH was found dead in the classroom
-The gun code was erased
-The receipt for the gun was found in the bag



These are the theories made about this

-CSH had bought the guns for someone else?
-The killer knew CSH did not have a positive social life
-The killer decided to use CSH
-The killer had planned this out to keep himself covered


One last thing,
The timing is not logical

CSH took 2 hours to get to the 2nd shooting after the 1st.
In 2 hours, it is impossible to film, edit the video, get to the post office and have it in the receiver's inbox.

So the video was made before the incident, with the Killer?

So wassup?

[Simba]

The Following are FACTS

CSH(Cho Seung Hee)

Anyhow. Sure, this it was certainly an interesting read, but there's plenty of stuff in there that's either iffy or really just an overload on speculation.

12. Obviously, the video he had sent, was not made by himself. Even the New York Times pointed this out.

Self-timer, tripod, any still surface, anybody?

And why did CSH, after the first shootings, make the video, walk around the school to send it, and then go to the 2nd shootings?

Get the video sent over for media attention, and then shoot some more people up to finish the job. (Why would he say all that in his video, and not shoot some more people?)

CSH took 2 hours to get to the 2nd shooting after the 1st.
In 2 hours, it is impossible to film, edit the video, get to the post office and have it in the receiver's inbox.

So the video was made before the incident, with the Killer?

Sure, the video could have been made before the incident, but there didn't have to be another person involved for it to have worked out.

-The killer had planned this out to keep himself covered

Then why not have Cho in the video? No reason to video yourself and send it to the media all while trying to keep your cover. If the person in the media package wasn't Cho or wasn't the supposed "killer" (because that would be just plain stupid), then who else could have been the subject of the video have been, and for what reason?

[*Podomaht*]

Anyhow. Sure, this it was certainly an interesting read, but there's plenty of stuff in there that's either iffy or really just an overload on speculation.

Self-timer, tripod, any still surface, anybody?
Get the video sent over for media attention, and then shoot some more people up to finish the job. (Why would he say all that in his video, and not shoot some more people?)
Sure, the video could have been made before the incident, but there didn't have to be another person involved for it to have worked out.
Then why not have Cho in the video? No reason to video yourself and send it to the media all while trying to keep your cover. If the person in the media package wasn't Cho or wasn't the supposed "killer" (because that would be just plain stupid), then who else could have been the subject of the video have been, and for what reason?

First. It's correct with Hee. Cho Seung Hee is how it's romanized.

Bitch.

Second. Not to big on this topic, so I'll skip.

Third. I'd like to see you type out a manifesto, shoot multiple videos, take pictures, and edit them into a DVD within two hours.

Fourth. You are giving your opinion on this one, so I'll just say you're retarded.

Fifth. Maybe he was trying to cover his identity because I don't know...maybe...HE DIDNT WANT TO GO TO JAIL/BE f**ked IN THE ASS?

Sixth. It's called a scapegoat.

Also, explain the whole three shots to himself? I'm not saying all this is true, but all the comments you wrote about them were completely stupid and space-wasting.