Graphics, gone to hell? |
Graphics, gone to hell? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 ![]() |
Sorry if I sound like a broken record but what is happening to the graphics? The quality is decreasing and it looks like some of the mods (not saying any names) aren't reading the submission rules or guidelines. Just looking through the first two pages I can see four of five graphics that are either poor quality or go against the rules. Wasn't the whole point of having a queue to weed out the bad graphics?
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 ![]() |
That is a good idea. No problem with examples, I just didn't feel like getting b*tched out again.
These are not supposed to be accepted. It's album art. This is not even remotely in focus and poor quality. Backgrounds have to be a minimum of 800x600px unless its a repeated one. This is a jocked image from DA and an extremely well known image. Don't know why no one caught that. 1 2 3 and there's much more. That was just the first two or three pages. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |