WHAT'S NEW MR PUSSY CAT Options

[*kryogenix*]

http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php...t&p=2539036

Evidence provided was:

http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php...t&p=2538981
http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php...t&p=2539000

The first link, did not mention the other guy at all, it was stating a fact.

The second link is not bashing, nor did he seem offended at all.

The best part was I was trying to get it back on topic, and this is how you thank me? I'm better off not helping you guys.

[Simba]

The thing that makes those posts so insulting is that he felt that you were mocking him (which you were), which is more or less why he replied to you with such hostility.

1) "Wow that's utter fail." Insulting his statements.
2) "Are you slow or something?" Although your intention was to tell him to "take a look at the situation again before he continued messing up the debate," you said it in an insulting way.
3) Regardless of whether or not it was defensive or not, it was insulting to him; "wow is this kid for real?"
4) You were insulting his logic. Sarcastic because you can't win a national debate with an argument like that. (However, it's not the national debate bit that makes the post offensive, it's that you were insulting his logic.)

[*kryogenix*]

The thing that makes those posts so insulting is that he felt that you were mocking him (which you were), which is more or less why he replied to you with such hostility.

1) "Wow that's utter fail." Insulting his statements.

That's not member bashing, that's statement bashing. That's what happens in debates, deal with it.

2) "Are you slow or something?" Although your intention was to tell him to "take a look at the situation again before he continued messing up the debate," you said it in an insulting way.

No I didn't. I didn't say, wow, are you a f**king retard. Slow is the more politically correct term.

3) Regardless of whether or not it was defensive or not, it was insulting to him; "wow is this kid for real?"

I'm asking, are you serious. That way there is no confusion. It's an expression. Deal with it.

4) You were insulting his logic. Sarcastic because you can't win a national debate with an argument like that. (However, it's not the national debate bit that makes the post offensive, it's that you were insulting his logic.)

See #1.

[Simba]

That's not member bashing, that's statement bashing. That's what happens in debates, deal with it.

Ok, so now we both agree that it was bashing. Because it was his statement, it would end up as insulting him. Just like if I said what Jimmy said was garbage, he would have every right to feel offended, as he was the one who produced whatever statement.

No I didn't. I didn't say, wow, are you a f**king retard. Slow is the more politically correct term.

The specific words you used doesn't matter here. You were conveying the same message, which was an offensive one.

I'm asking, are you serious. That way there is no confusion. It's an expression. Deal with it.

The way that you expressed the question was insulting.

[*kryogenix*]

Ok, so now we both agree that it was bashing. Because it was his statement, it would end up as insulting him. Just like if I said what Jimmy said was garbage, he would have every right to feel offended, as he was the one who produced whatever statement.

Reading comprehension dude.

I attacked what he said, not the person. That's what a debate is. If I said Jimmy, that statement is garbage, I'm not calling Jimmy garbage.

The specific words you used doesn't matter here. You were conveying the same message, which was an offensive one.

You're changing your story now. First you said I was saying it in an insulting way, which was the reason why it was bashing. But now it doesn't even matter that it wasn't insulting, because it's insulting to ask someone if they don't understand?

The way that you expressed the question was insulting.

Flip flopping. You just said it doesn't matter, now it does matter how I say it?

Pick one thing and stick with it.

[Simba]

I attacked what he said, not the person. That's what a debate is. If I said Jimmy, that statement is garbage, I'm not calling Jimmy garbage.

Say you called Jimmy garbage. Now you may have offended Jimmy's mother.

You're changing your story now. First you said I was saying it in an insulting way, which was the reason why it was bashing. But now it doesn't even matter that it wasn't insulting, because it's insulting to ask someone if they don't understand?
Flip flopping. You just said it doesn't matter, now it does matter how I say it?

Pick one thing and stick with it.

In the case of calling him "slow," it doesn't matter what words you were using whether it be "slow" or "retarded" because you were trying to convey the message that he was "slow."

Now where you were asking him if he was for real: sure you may have been asking him if he was serious but it was your specific choice of words that made it offensive.

The two situations are not the same.

[*kryogenix*]

Say you called Jimmy garbage. Now you may have offended Jimmy's mother.

What are you talking about?

In the case of calling him "slow," it doesn't matter what words you were using whether it be "slow" or "retarded" because you were trying to convey the message that he was "slow."

No, I was asking.

Now where you were asking him if he was for real: sure you may have been asking him if he was serious but it was your specific choice of words that made it offensive.

YOU FO REAL? How many times have you heard that? It means ARE YOU SERIOUS?

I'm sorry, I was born and lived in NYC, don't hate on me because of that.

The two situations are not the same.

ARE YOU FOR REAL?