WHAT'S NEW MR PUSSY CAT Options

[*kryogenix*]

http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php...t&p=2539036

Evidence provided was:

http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php...t&p=2538981
http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php...t&p=2539000

The first link, did not mention the other guy at all, it was stating a fact.

The second link is not bashing, nor did he seem offended at all.

The best part was I was trying to get it back on topic, and this is how you thank me? I'm better off not helping you guys.

[technicolour]

Actually, the first link's post is rather an opinion. However, through the fact that you seemed so compelled to further your little debacle with the other guy, just furthered the "Non-Topic"-ness, Jesus felt that you/y'all needed a push to get back on topic.

The warning was justified.

[*kryogenix*]

Actually, the first link's post is rather an opinion. However, through the fact that you seemed so compelled to further your little debacle with the other guy, just furthered the "Non-Topic"-ness, Jesus felt that you/y'all needed a push to get back on topic.

The warning was justified.

Fail. Read the topic again, I was trying to tell him he was misunderstanding my posts, and even after he warned us, I still tried to bring it back on topic, and I didn't bash at all.

Um..I guess the first one could be twisted around to be that you were stating a fact. I could roll with that one. :|

Even the second one.

But I think Arjuna was clearly asking you to stick to topic, and I didn't really get the feeling that you were trying to from those posts. ermm.gif

You continued after he told you to stop, and throughout the whole conversation you WERE ridiculing him. Those two links were just bad examples.

Fail. Read my posts again after the initial warning. I spoke about the debate at hand, and I told him to bring it back on topic.

I was the good guy here, but if you don't want that, then I don't know what to do.