warning level |
warning level |
*kryogenix* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
some nappy headed ho raised my warning level without explaining why. i don't know what i'm doing wrong.
|
|
|
![]() |
*Duchess of Dork* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
Well, I don't recall saying more than a few people or otherwise. I said that some people were offended. Either way, you wanted a response and I obliged you with one.
Sorry that you feel that the moderators are incompetent and that the community is no longer great. You weren't warned for those threads I closed, I merely closed them. If you'd like I can edit the post in which I closed the first thread. I'd rather leave it intact though, since essentially the link should have been posted and lesson learned, example made. "Demanding" aside, if I think that you have broken a rule, I will site the rule that I believe you have broken. I didn't post the rules verbatim in my most recent response, I linked them. I'm not sure why you are offended by that. But since you are, it'll cease (which would have happened anyway, since for my part, there's nothing more I can say other than that which I have said). We disagree, and that is all there is to it. |
|
|
*kryogenix* |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Guest ![]() |
Well, I don't recall saying more than a few people or otherwise. I said that some people were offended. Either way, you wanted a response and I obliged you with one. Oh, so now it only takes a few people to get offended before something is deemed warn-worthy? QUOTE Sorry that you feel that the moderators are incompetent and that the community is no longer great. You're assuming again. QUOTE You weren't warned for those threads I closed, I merely closed them. If you'd like I can edit the post in which I closed the first thread. I'd rather leave it intact though, since essentially the link should have been posted and lesson learned, example made. My verbal warning was for racism. But my posts weren't racist, so why did it progress further without clarifying with me first? QUOTE "Demanding" aside, if I think that you have broken a rule, I will site the rule that I believe you have broken. I didn't post the rules verbatim in my most recent response, I linked them. I'm not sure why you are offended by that. But since you are, it'll cease (which would have happened anyway, since for my part, there's nothing more I can say other than that which I have said). Good, cause I would have had to report your posts if you continued. QUOTE We disagree, and that is all there is to it. So why did you guys have to make it a big deal? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Home is where your rump rests! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,235 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 451,969 ![]() |
James, I've already explained that I did not give enough warning nor was I clear enough on why you were warned. However, I've now explained why you were warned in earlier posts. Why have the explanations given thus far not count as "valid"? What exactly more do you want?
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |