bombings on japan, were the really needed |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
bombings on japan, were the really needed |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 664 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,686 ![]() |
do u guys think the 2 bombs dropped on japan during WW2 were really needed?
i say no because they just killed innoc3nt people in those 2 citys and it left a perment mental damage on my grandma (im japanese) so what do u guys think |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Quand j'étais jeune... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 6,826 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,272 ![]() |
Well, the US gave many warnings in advance but Japan didn't surrender until the second bomb, and also with the threat of a third bomb targeted at Tokyo.
ComradeRed: Were the surrender transcripts that the Emperor prepared meant to be an unconditional surrender? I'm not sure of the details, but I thought Emperor Showa didn't agree to it until 8/14? To those who said that we should have bombed a military base instead of these two cities, PLEASE consider these: During World War II, Hiroshima was a city with that contained the 2nd Army Headquarters, and one of the key storage and communication center. As for Nagasaki, it was one of the largest sea ports responsible for various industries (ship, military equipments... etc). |
|
|
![]() ![]() |