warning level Options

[*kryogenix*]

some nappy headed ho raised my warning level without explaining why. i don't know what i'm doing wrong.

[*kryogenix*]

I'm not stupid and I take offense that you're treating me like this. I know the rules. What I don't understand is your interpretation of the rules. There's plenty of other topics which have titles that have nothing to do with the first post in them. That makes it a lot more random than my thread. How can you say that no one will be able to reply in a productive manner when it's been open for such a short time and no one has spammed in it. There are plenty of other threads that have been less productive than mine, but were left to remain open. Find a better explanation.

Let's quote the verbal warning.

That's ENOUGH, James. This is your verbal warning. Another one of that same racist remark, and your warning level will raised.

However, I argued that the remark is not in fact racist, which when taken in context to how I used it, it is not. Therefore it should have ended right here, or at least been discussed further, however she just disregarded that and went on warning anyway.

The fact of the matter is, any challenge to staff authority, even when it is within the rules, will be cited by the staff as posts no one wants or as unproductive. I think that the staff would be wise to try to iron out any misunderstandings. Cause I feel that I'm not the only one who has a problem with the way things are run around here.

Hmm, I suppose my box is full, but I don't mind bringing the conversation to public for the time being while I decide which things to delete. It helps keep things transparent in case any other members of the community want to chime in.