Out of control Boy's Locker Room Options

[phoenixpyre]

There is an abundance of UN PG-13 topics in there about female orifices, explicit sexual acts, etc. and it's driving me crazy that NO ONE is doing anything about it.

Look at this garbage (all on the first page too)

Poll: Have You Ever Seen One ? (Mens Version).

[referring to the female orifice]

Guys who go through o**l sex are not considered virgins anymore.

Fingering.

Do they discuss these things in PG-13 movies? Because if so I am certainly missing them (thank the lord).

[*Duchess of Dork*]

One of the problems with anything rated "PG-13" is its inherent subjectivity.

PG-13 is thus a sterner warning to parents, particularly when deciding which movies are not suitable for younger children. Parents, by the rating, are alerted to be very careful about the attendance of their under-teenage children. A PG-13 film is one which, in the view of the Rating Board, leaps beyond the boundaries of the PG rating in theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, or other contents, but does not quite fit within the restricted R category. Any drug use content will initially require at least a PG-13 rating. In effect, the PG-13 cautions parents with more stringency than usual to give special attention to this film before they allow their 12-year-olds and younger to attend. If nudity is sexually oriented, the film will generally not be found in the PG-13 category. If violence is too rough or persistent, the film goes into the R (restricted) rating. A film's single use of one of the harsher sexually derived words, though only as an expletive, shall initially require the Rating Board to issue that film at least a PG-13 rating. More than one such expletive must lead the Rating Board to issue a film an R rating, as must even one of these words used in a sexual context. These films can be rated less severely, however, if by a special vote, the Rating Board feels that a lesser rating would more responsibly reflect the opinion of American parents.

PG-13 places larger responsibilities on parents for their children and moviegoing. The voluntary rating system is not a surrogate parent, nor should it be. It cannot, and should not, insert itself in family decisions that only parents can make. Its purpose is to give pre-screened informational warnings, so that parents can form their own judgments. PG-13 is designed to make parental decisions easier for films between PG and R.

Source: MPAA Ratings
I'd really like to point out the bolded paragraph. While we try to keep things reasonably PG-13, the system isn't foolproof, neither are the "rules" in regards to the forum content rating/guideline.

You have to use judgement, same as we (the moderators) do.

I respect your concerns and I think that it's admirable that you care. However, I will have to respectfully disagree that what you have mentioned is in violation of cB Rules.

My recommendation is that if you see something you feel *is* in violation, report the post or send a link to that post/topic to a Staff Member with moderating powers in that forum (most likely a People Staff, Admin or Head Staff) and we'll discuss it. Sometimes *we're* wrong. Sometimes we might miss something. Either way, no one here wants anyone to feel uncomfortable. :)