The Problem of Evil, Another Theological Problem |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
The Problem of Evil, Another Theological Problem |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Photoartist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 ![]() |
The "problem of evil" is an argument against the existence of an omnipotent, omni-benevolent God. Basically, this proposes that an omnipotent and omni-benevolent God and evil existing in our world contradict and that because there is clearly evil in the world, God cannot exist.
The logical problem of evil argument, I personally think, does the best job of making what the problem of evil is proposing clear. QUOTE 1. God exists. (premise) 2. God is omnipotent. (premise - or true by definition of the word 'God') 3. God is all-benevolent. (premise - or true by definition) 4. All-benevolent beings are opposed to all evil. (premise - or true by definition) 5. All-benevolent beings who can eliminate evil will do so immediately when they become aware of it. (premise) 6. God is opposed to all evil. (conclusion from 3 and 4) 7. God can eliminate evil completely and immediately. (conclusion from 2) 1. Whatever the end result of suffering is, God can bring it about by ways which do not include suffering. (conclusion from 2)8. God will eliminate evil completely and immediately. (conclusion from 6, 7.2 and 7.3) 9. Evil exists, has existed, and probably will always exist. (premise) 10. Items 8 and 9 are contradictory; therefore, one or more of the premises is false: either God does not exist, or he is not both omnipotent and all-benevolent or there is a reason why He does not act immediately. On the flip side, one of the most popular defenses is proposed by Augustine of Hippo, a Christian, which basically goes that evil is only the complete deprivation of good. I personally think that argument is relatively weak, so I'll also throw in the free will argument (which basically states that God gave us free will as to not have us as "mindless robots") just to have the topic start out somewhat neutral. QUOTE 1. Free will requires the potential to so anything one chooses. (premise, or by definition) 2. Thus, free will requires the potential to do evil. 3. Thus, removing the potential to do evil would remove free will. Discuss. |
|
|
![]() |
*Uronacid* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
Ahhhh...
Alright well, as I was saying before, I don't think reincarnation is supported by the Bible. There are obviously verses that "when taken out of context" could appear to have reference to reincarnation, but to my understanding most of those verses have reference to individuals having a symbolic "change of heart" when they turn to the Lord. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |