The Problem of Evil, Another Theological Problem Options

[Simba]

The "problem of evil" is an argument against the existence of an omnipotent, omni-benevolent God. Basically, this proposes that an omnipotent and omni-benevolent God and evil existing in our world contradict and that because there is clearly evil in the world, God cannot exist.

The logical problem of evil argument, I personally think, does the best job of making what the problem of evil is proposing clear.

1. God exists. (premise)
2. God is omnipotent. (premise - or true by definition of the word 'God')
3. God is all-benevolent. (premise - or true by definition)
4. All-benevolent beings are opposed to all evil. (premise - or true by definition)
5. All-benevolent beings who can eliminate evil will do so immediately when they become aware of it. (premise)
6. God is opposed to all evil. (conclusion from 3 and 4)
7. God can eliminate evil completely and immediately. (conclusion from 2)

1. Whatever the end result of suffering is, God can bring it about by ways which do not include suffering. (conclusion from 2)
2. God has no reason not to eliminate evil. (conclusion from 7.1)
3. God has no reason not to act immediately. (conclusion from 5)

8. God will eliminate evil completely and immediately. (conclusion from 6, 7.2 and 7.3)
9. Evil exists, has existed, and probably will always exist. (premise)
10. Items 8 and 9 are contradictory; therefore, one or more of the premises is false: either God does not exist, or he is not both omnipotent and all-benevolent or there is a reason why He does not act immediately.

On the flip side, one of the most popular defenses is proposed by Augustine of Hippo, a Christian, which basically goes that evil is only the complete deprivation of good.

I personally think that argument is relatively weak, so I'll also throw in the free will argument (which basically states that God gave us free will as to not have us as "mindless robots") just to have the topic start out somewhat neutral.

1. Free will requires the potential to so anything one chooses. (premise, or by definition)
2. Thus, free will requires the potential to do evil.
3. Thus, removing the potential to do evil would remove free will.

Discuss.

[Simba]

Well, alright. To start off with, I'd like to note that my explanation is backed up not by the Bible, but by the Bhagavad-Gita. I, specifically, refer to Bhagavad Gita As It Is, written by A. C. Bhaktivedata Swami Prabhupada who is uniquely, and completely qualified to present the Bhagavad-Gita without adulteration (hence, "As It Is").

Now first, in order to understand this explanation, one must accept the realities of the Supreme Being, material nature, eternity, karma and reincarnation, and that you are not the body, but the eternal spirit. Many unenlightened peoples identify the self as the material body, and that their function is to be the enjoyer, and that the purpose of life is to find enjoyment in the material world. In reality, a person's natural function is to unconditionally love and serve God.

With the idea of being the enjoyer, people become really frustrated when reality hits them with death, disease, etcetera, and suffering becomes "evil." In human perspective, "evil" is suffering and suffering is "evil."

The material world has been created for spirits who are envious of the Lord. The material world is created as a place of pleasure, as well as suffering. The reasoning behind this is to allow the individual spirits the freedom to pursue their desire to be the enjoyer, and at the same time, teach the spirits that the role of enjoyer does not lead to absolute happiness and satisfaction.

God let's us pursue the role of enjoyer, but out of His grace, He has also placed "reminders" that real happiness and satisfaction and our real homes are not in this material world, but elsewhere. To humans, these "reminders" are known as suffering, including birth, death, aging, disease, etcetera. So really, suffering shouldn't be thought of as "evil," but rather be thought of rather positively.

Often, an intelligent person who is continually being punched in the face wants to go out and seek why it is that he is constantly being punched in the face in order to stop being punched in the face. People in this world are continually suffering, and some never go out and find out why. The intelligent person would want to go out and find out why he continues to suffer.

In order to stop suffering, one must get off the cycle of birth and death which is known as reincarnation. Reincarnation is not perpetual (a misunderstanding often made); one gets off of the cycle of reincarnation by achieving God consciousness (which may not be as easy as it may sound at the moment).

Ultimately, suffering shouldn't be seen as "evil," as it is natural in this material world. What's unnatural the spirit's being here in this material world.


I'm assuming there's going to be questions (since these concepts are not commonly known in the western world) and rebuttals against that whole explanation; go ahead, I'll reply. Oh yeah, and I guess I better establish this now that I do not follow and formal, organized religion. (This would include Hindu.)