What's wrong with PNG files? |
What's wrong with PNG files? |
| *The Markster* |
Mar 18 2007, 11:02 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guest |
I realize that people can still use PNG files because of their high reliability. But aside from the fact that, for an unknown reason, many are neglecting PNG files and looking up to GIF files instead, is there anything technically inconvenient with PNG files? I do know that some browsers experience alpha transparency issues with them, but I've heard that there's some fixes too. But I'm not really sure. xD
So yeah. Could someone please tell me the pros and cons of it, and if they have fixes? Thanks. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| *mipadi* |
Mar 19 2007, 10:59 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
PNG is a great format, aside from the fact that PNG file sizes are slightly larger than that of JPEG (due to the fact that PNG is a loss-less compression format). Of course, not all browsers (specifically, IE) have full support for transparent PNGs, so you can't expect everyone to view them properly.
Actually, I expect Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) to eventually supersede PNG, or at least start to gain popularity, since it's a better file format—but not a lot of browsers have support for SVG yet. (Firefox does, as well as WebKit-based browsers like Safari.) |
|
|
|
The Markster What's wrong with PNG files? Mar 18 2007, 11:02 PM
a beautiful nothing I think there is a fix for it for myspace (w/ the ... Mar 18 2007, 11:04 PM
Azarel I don't know what the fixes are, but there is ... Mar 18 2007, 11:04 PM
The Markster QUOTE(Azarel @ Mar 18 2007, 9:04 PM) I do... Mar 18 2007, 11:58 PM![]() ![]() |