Anonymous Posting. Options

[*Monochrome.*]

Well as I was looking through Mod.Preformance thread.I noticed theres alot of fighting and bickering in there.Now sometimes because of this reason Members feel that they need to make a different account just that they can get their point across without having to reveal who they are,So that it wont look likethey have a personal problem the mod they are critiqing on.

However,With power to IP track identitys become Revealed and then more problems arise.

My Idea is to have a anonymous post ability where it cannot be IP tracked unless they are member bashing, or spaming or whatever.

What do you think?

[*I Viddy Horrorshow*]

I stipulated both constructive and, crucially, valid. You were repeating things I had already dealt with several times. I should perhaps have mentioned that the criticism should also be fresh and not repetitive.

I'm sorry if that mislead you.



And also, I'm not having this argument with you again, and certainly not in this thread, so do try not to fall back into the same old rut if at all avoidable.
---

Rebecca, DO stop beating me to things.

[*Uronacid*]

I stipulated both constructive and, crucially, valid. You were repeating things I had already dealt with several times. I should perhaps have mentioned that the criticism should also be fresh and not repetitive.

I'm sorry if that mislead you.



And also, I'm not having this argument with you again, and certainly not in this thread, so do try not to fall back into the same old rut if at all avoidable.
---

Rebecca, DO stop beating me to things.

James, you tried to "tell me off" (for lack of a better word). Your post seemed insulting, looming, and arrogant.

It's as if every time I had it up you find a way to insult me. I don't know what literature your reading, but most of the conflict management book I have read don't suggest "insults". I keep repeating it because you insult me. It's consistent James, and you have never once had empathy with me. You have never once shown me that you were willing to make an attempt to understand me, and if you did I apologize for not recognizing it and I would like you to post an example so that I can understand.

BUT, that type of response isn't really moderator feedback, it's James feedback. Meaning, you were put off by him agreeing with you because you felt it was in conjuction with the site creator's return. That has nothing to do with his job as a moderator here.

James is a moderator... I went to him with my problem and he gave me an insulting response.

Yes, my problem was with him. He's a moderator, and it was disappointing for me to see a Moderator give my ideas negative reviews and then change his mind in what seemed conjoined with the site creators return. It lead me to believe that he has a personal problem with me. I addressed my issue with James and received an insulting response. I feel as if the problem with me is effecting his ability to make clear headed decisions and perform as a moderator. I feel that he moderates unfairly when making decisions that effect me and members that share my ideas.

There is conflict, it effects the members of this site, and it needs to be resolved. I see it as more than just personal.

I guess this leads me to ask the question... What type of problems should be brought up in feedback? What should be considered too personal?