Staff Member/ Member of the Month |
Staff Member/ Member of the Month |
Feb 18 2007, 07:28 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Peggy. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,508 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 214,025 |
I am not sure if this is the right place to post this topic...
Anyway, I think the "Staff Member of the Month" and "Member of the Month" threads at the Lounge are mostly spam. Isn't that thread supposed to be nominatons and suggestions? The majority of the posts in these threads are "Congrats _______! You really deserve it." As I was skimming through replies in these threads, only like 4 or 5 replies are nominations, the other 30 something replies are those "Congrats!" spams or unnecessary arguments. If members want to congratulate the winners, they could just simply do it through PM or ALONG WITH THEIR NOMINATIONS. I know the staff votes out FROM THE NOMINATIONS, which the staff votes from the one or two people that got nominated (because there are only 4-5 people nominated, and usually the same people are being nominated, so the nominated members have like a 50% chance of winning). I don't mean that they don't deserve the SMoTM or MoTM, but could the amount of spam in these threads be reduced and add more nominations in? Just stating my own opinion. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 21 2007, 01:42 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Home is where your rump rests! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,235 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 451,969 |
Just stating my own opinion. Why the smiley? Stating opinions is what this forum's for, and you backed up your opinion well. (:However, I disagree, mostly because I enjoy congrulating them in that thread; it's just how it's been and how it probably will be for as long as it exists. Having congratulations there doesn't, imo, discourage people from nominating others. And there are usually more than just two nominations, there's usually at least three. |
|
|
|
Monokuro Boo. Staff Member/ Member of the Month Feb 18 2007, 07:28 PM
Sherlock. What's wrong with congratulatory messages? It... Feb 18 2007, 07:31 PM
StanleyThePanda Well, I personally don't see a problem with Co... Feb 18 2007, 07:34 PM
Intercourse. I agree with Kristina.
I think its fine for peopl... Feb 18 2007, 07:35 PM
WHIMSICAL 0NE I know this sounds odd, but who skims through if t... Feb 18 2007, 07:40 PM
annonymous. I guess I'll add my 2 cents.
Honestly, I agre... Feb 18 2007, 08:46 PM![]() ![]() |