Beyonce ruins models' lives, The singer to be on the cover of the SI Swimsuit edition |
Beyonce ruins models' lives, The singer to be on the cover of the SI Swimsuit edition |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Amberific. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,913 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 29,772 ![]() |
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/features/...imsuit/beyonce/
To quote from the writer of the Superficial: QUOTE For some reason the clowns at Sports Illustrated decided to put Beyonce on the cover of their 2007 Swimsuit Issue, a privilege usually reserved for the baddest ass of supermodels. I'm not saying she doesn't look great in her bikini (because she does) she just has no business being there. This isn't Entertainment Weekly, it's the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition. Beyonce has about as much right being there as a dog dressed in a silly hat and a cape. I think that pretty much sums it up.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Home is where your rump rests! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,235 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 451,969 ![]() |
Beyonce is a: fashion designer, singer, actress. That, I believe, would the "triple-threat" that's used to describe her.
And honestly, Beyonce's absolutely beautiful but I've seen her do better photo shoots than that. I mean, the cover and pictures look great, but compared to some other covers, this was a lot like risque and unique. I don't have anything against her being on the cover; they've featured celebrities before, but it's the picture itself that dissapoints (not that I look at SI Swimsuit Edition, but from a uh, fashion perspective). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() You can't keep running from what you're trying to find. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 5,030 Joined: Oct 2004 Member No: 54,096 ![]() |
I don't have anything against her being on the cover; they've featured celebrities before, but it's the picture itself that dissapoints (not that I look at SI Swimsuit Edition, but from a uh, fashion perspective). exactly... I'm getting tired of ONLY celebrities being on magazine covers (except for maybe Weddings or something, but then again... probably those too). Why do you think Vogue in Europe never uses celebrities for their covers? |
|
|
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Guest ![]() |
exactly... I'm getting tired of ONLY celebrities being on magazine covers (except for maybe Weddings or something, but then again... probably those too). Why do you think Vogue in Europe never uses celebrities for their covers? That's because Europeans don't obsess over celebrities like us Americans do. Even though it is not fair, it makes the magazines sell more. Since Beyonce is in the peak of her career (maybe), they thought that if they put Beyonce on the cover, more people will want to buy the magazine. In the end, they just want the money. They don't really care if another famous model is born. Exactly. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Amberific. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,913 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 29,772 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |