Mr. Bush, let us discuss |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Mr. Bush, let us discuss |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,450 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 98,407 ![]() |
Do you hate him? If you do, why?
I have no comment about him, because I really don't know enough to say I dislike him, or to say I do like him. A lot of people make fun of him, and from the way I see it, others join in and make fun of him too, saying they hate him as well. That annoys me. Everything annoys me these days. So tell me about Mr. Bush, and explain why you dislike him, or like him. BECAUSE YOUR OPINION COUNTS! |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 234 Joined: Sep 2006 Member No: 467,786 ![]() |
I hate him, I don't think anything hes done was good especially sending troops in Iraq, I think it was UN-NEEDED for that, if he was to run for 10 more years I highly doubt there would be a United States to be honest, there would be a huge war because hes getting into other peoples business, thats my upinion.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 61 Joined: Jan 2007 Member No: 495,973 ![]() |
I hate him, I don't think anything hes done was good especially sending troops in Iraq, I think it was UN-NEEDED for that, if he was to run for 10 more years I highly doubt there would be a United States to be honest, there would be a huge war because hes getting into other peoples business, thats my upinion. Not to bust your chops or anything, but do you really think the current conflict is as serious, deadly, or pointless as Vietnam? The USA didn't implode on itself then. Believe it or not, it's lasted for about 40 more years! Don't misunderstand my point here; I don't believe the conflict in Iraq is strategic or necessary just as much as the next chum, but before I go making doomsday claims that the USA would be toast in 10 more years if we don't flee before then, I take a cursory glance at the history pages. Once you try that, you might soon realize that this country has endured lots worse than the war in Iraq. And that, my friend, is an "upinion" based upon logic and not pure "this is what I think, l0lz!!11" QUOTE Yes, I'm like the rest of the people who replied to this topic. I hate Bush. He started a war with Iraq, which wasn't even needed. He f**ked up the whole US, and what pisses me off is that he started the war, and is killing a lot of innocent civilians in Iraq AND he is killing the people of our country. Yeah, they died for our country, but it would be better if they STAYED ALIVE. He's a damn idiotic person, who needs to go to hell. I never liked him, and I never will change my opinion about him. I don't get HOW he won the election two times. He hasn't done any good for our country in the past 4 years, so how the hell did people choose to vote for him AGAIN? His dad also f**ked up the country too. Also, I'm pretty sure there was already a lot of topics on Bush before. Once again, I'll reiterate the fact that I'm not a Bush sympathizer. I'm quite the antithesis, actually, and I wouldn't have voted for him (nor Kerry) in 2004. That being said, you need to consider how incorrect you are in some of your generalizations, just as the person before you. He's "f**ked up the whole US"? I'll admit, there are a few things gone awry, but the people in the 1990s claimed the very same thing about the state of the country (when it didn't have a Bush at the helm). Let's examine your luxuries, a minute. You probably ate three square meals today, enjoyed a decent educational experience at school, took a shower, maybe enjoyed the outdoors? We know, obviously, you wired up to the internet (probably via broadband) and posted your generalization, etc etc. I'm willing to wager that you live a life relatively free of true turmoil (in relation to the turmoil that citizens of other countries, many of them industrialized, face). Another thing I notice is how quickly you seem to forget that the Iraqi invasion had massive bipartisan support in Congress (77 to 23 in favor). How then, therefore, can you pin as much blame as you do on the president and let Congress wholly off the hook? Lambaste the president as much as you'd like -- that's your right -- but don't forget his supporting cast. Now, let's say 2008 brings us a Democrat in the White House. Fantastic, I'd be happy knowing that a leader of my party was elected. However, I'll halt my naivety long enough to realize that not much is going to change. The Democrats hold the majority in the Congress now, and we haven't seen any real objection to or action against the Iraq war thus far. Why do you believe that as soon as a Democrat rolls into the White House all our problems will magically vanish? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |