Is is rape or, is it not??? |
Is is rape or, is it not??? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() CheccMate Foo! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 839 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 487,531 ![]() |
My cousin's buddy who's 4 months younger than me (I'm 20) is going out with a 14 year old girl. Now that's just statutory to me but he keeps insisting that it's not just because of the fact he insists and stresses that they don't have sex because she doesn't want him to get in trouble and that he cares about her. He keeps repeating that all they do is hold hands, kiss, hug, sleep with each other (literally sleeping), and get to know each other. But my cousin also told me that they perform orally on each other. What's the law about this and what are they technically doing? Oh yeah, I always wondered how much jailtime a person does for that.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Head Staff Posts: 18,173 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 108,478 ![]() |
It's considered statutory rape if someone over 18 goes out with someone under 18 whether or not they have sexual intercourse.
|
|
|
*mishyerr* |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Guest ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
Yup. And if she gets angry at him and decides to bring it to court, he's basically SCREWED. Uhmmmm, no. Statutory Rape only occurs when the "victim" is under the age of consent. The age of consent is not the age of majority everywhere. Further, dating, in of itself, is not a crime. Sexual contact, on the other hand, is. |
|
|
*mishyerr* |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Guest ![]() |
Uhmmmm, no. Statutory Rape only occurs when the "victim" is under the age of consent. The age of consent is not the age of majority everywhere. Further, dating, in of itself, is not a crime. Sexual contact, on the other hand, is. She is under the age of consent, and if she did decide she were angry at him, she could say that he forced her to do 'oral' with him. The person who was asking did mention that they did make sexual contact. So, if she considered herself the 'victim', since she is 14 and he is either 19 or 20, and she claims that they did have sexual contact, then yes, he could be in trouble. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
She is under the age of consent, and if she did decide she were angry at him, she could say that he forced her to do 'oral' with him. The person who was asking did mention that they did make sexual contact. So, if she considered herself the 'victim', since she is 14 and he is either 19 or 20, and she claims that they did have sexual contact, then yes, he could be in trouble. I don't think you understand. I was referring to the affirmation of the idea that an 18 year old can not, legally, go out with anyone under 18 years of age. QUOTE It's considered statutory rape if someone over 18 goes out with someone under 18 whether or not they have sexual intercourse. That bullshit. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |