bombings on japan, were the really needed |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
bombings on japan, were the really needed |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 664 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,686 ![]() |
do u guys think the 2 bombs dropped on japan during WW2 were really needed?
i say no because they just killed innoc3nt people in those 2 citys and it left a perment mental damage on my grandma (im japanese) so what do u guys think |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Quand j'étais jeune... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 6,826 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,272 ![]() |
QUOTE(innoc3nt619 @ Jun 7 2004, 12:45 AM) see they had honor in their country and they attacked military but the US attacked normal citys which is pretty messed up! ![]() And attacking Pearl Harbor without declaring war is honor? The declaration of war was late... very late. Where's honor is attacking when one is unprepared? (Edit:: It's like kicking a man when he's down). You call that honor? Why attack Pearl Harbor at all? EDIT:: I realize that Pearl Harbor was a strategic base and that there are benefits to its destruction... BUT YOU CAN'T attack someone and not expect to be attacked back... What kind of childish thinking is that? Oh I hit you, but you can't hit me back... Sounds like something I would say to my older brother after I bruised him. And they killed a couple of thousands of troops in Pearl, I think. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |