photographers... cf vs sd? |
| *kryogenix* |
 Jan 14 2007, 01:09 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guest  |
let's breathe some life back into this place
 In the next few months, I'm going to purchase my first dSLR. I'm pretty set on the EOS 350D (rebel XT). Format isn't going the affect my buying decision, but I was wondering what you think will happen to CF. The trend has been leaning towards SD, with a lot of camera bodies supporting SD only and higher ends adding SD support. What is your opinion? I've always liked CF; suitably fast, rugged, small enough but not too small that it's easily lost if not in a case and very high density memory... I'd really like CF support to continue in the next few camera generations as I'd hate to have spend an extra $100 on memory. Your thoughts please. |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
|
Jan 14 2007, 03:13 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 Photoartist  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
Yeah, I hear good things about Canon's L series lenses. (The L series is just known for being extremely expensive. And excuse me if you're not even talking about the L lenses, that's just what most people are talking about when then say "IS.") As far as third-party lenses, I've at least heard some decent things about Tamron. Just don't get the superzooms. (That is, anything coming close to 18-200mm.)
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
kryogenix photographers... cf vs sd? Jan 14 2007, 01:09 PM
Arjuna Capulong Oooh the Canon Rebel XT. I've seen great photo... Jan 14 2007, 02:13 PM kryogenix Well I am a poor college student, so I chose the 3... Jan 14 2007, 03:03 PM
kryogenix Well, yeah, I was referring to the cheaper IS lens... Jan 14 2007, 03:44 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: