"Designing with the Stars", Take Joe-I-Can't-Design/Code-Crap and make him/her design... |
"Designing with the Stars", Take Joe-I-Can't-Design/Code-Crap and make him/her design... |
*Duchess of Dork* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
This came up because I was banging my head against the wall trying to figure out ways to graphically contribute here (other than my silly icons), so I posted the following Backstage and thought I would bring it up here as well to see what folks here in the Community thought of it:
QUOTE I am so ignorant when it comes to creating a layout. I almost feel that as the only HeadStaff that cannot do this, we should have some type of "Dancing with the Stars" type thing where someone takes a person that can't dance, well, in this case, do a layout, pair with them and at the end of the show they can do a killer layout! After a little encouragement, ranting continued: QUOTE Who knows though, it could be fun to see folks paired up with some of our infamous designers (such as Rachael, Carrie, Kristina (although I know she's very busy right now), Kathleen, Ryan, et al). Could even put up AIM transcriptions of the star designer trying to coach the learner on how to design (if so desired). Any thoughts? (Oh and sorry for pointing certain super designers out, I know there are more than those, but they are the first to came to mind that morning). |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() You'll find me in your dreams. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 8,536 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 114,010 ![]() |
Hm ... I still think a preliminary logo round would be nice. It would kind of teach the "star" what they were working with in their partner ... And it would be easy to incorperate some of that first round (Creating Basic Headers) into that round so that it's not really stressful to teach someone so much in so little time.
Maybe that's just me. And if you were to do a "two column" layout, would it have to be a linear header with the two columns under it ...? That's more something to think about. Perhaps it could be, and then you could progress into, um, "finding your own style" as round/part 2 ... Just a suggestion. That would also eliminate the secnd round that Mona proposed ... In a way. ![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |