CD Players.. |
CD Players.. |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() WUT THA DUCK? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,950 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 14,138 ![]() |
im wondering... wuts a really good CD player... thats cheap but wont skip songs or mess up... any ideas?
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() The red or the blue ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 294 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 19,976 ![]() |
QUOTE(Viggen @ Jun 2 2004, 7:54 PM) If you have to use a CD player, then the iRiver iMP350 Slim-X will fit your needs. And it comes with a remote and FM radio. Much better sound and build quality than the Sony. But once again, an MP3 player is a better and more logical choice IMO. I have to agree with Viggen on this and his other points. iRiver makes some of the best music players out there, thier MP3 players and their CD-Players. Sure they have a few bad ones, but a search will show that most people like thier products. Though the Slim-X is a bit expensive at over $100. It is extremely thin though and not much larger than a CD. Assuming of course you have a lot to shell out, I'd get the iRiver iHP-120 or w/e the model is. IMHO it is a much better MP3 player than the iPod (can you say overrated?). Just because a product says SONY doesn't make it good. Sure they have some good products, but does that mean you should spend more money for it? Take for example Sony Digital Camera, cool looks, but not the best features. Plus your stuck using expensive mediasticks as opposed to much cheaper Compactflash cards or SD cards. Of course if you can get a Sony at a decent price, meaning same cost as other things with same features, then I'd get that. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |