cellphones, should bloomberg ban the use of cell phone in school? Options

[anheuser]

free free to post here my answer: of course no!


bloomberg is creating sumting stupid. well he's trying to put metal detectors in midle and highschools. he's doing this so it can prevent use from bringing yur cellphones in school well isnt that a wrong thing to do like for example if there wuz an emergency wut would happen and if wanted to call yur parent what would u call them with so ... i just need a minute of yur time and just type in yes or no and u can and maybe type in sum feed bac about wut u think about it.. thxs for all your time all cb users!

[SilentxMage]

[font=Arial]Ok i dis-agree with bloomberg for many reasons and one of them because i live in New york.

-Anything could happen at any time,whether its death in your family,lets say you own mom or dad?What if someone needed to contact you to let you know.Not all schools actually take you out of class to let you know.My disagreement is based on that fact of emergency.

I mean sure it IS annoying to have little hoochies or thuggish boys talking on the phone or "key-ing" someone up.

Also someone who has posted in here brang up the topic of disturbance with the cell phones in class.Well as a student my self,yeah it can be a pain in the a** but hey its life.Your the one who has to stay focused no matter what distraction unless its like harmfull in my opinion.And for the teachers,If you see a student doing so,do them the favor and just tell them to get out.Or have them removed,its all about common sense.Like last year in my school i had my cell phone consfiscated because i had to call my dad because it was really important.So my dean saw me with it,and he took it,mind you IT was lunch time,im allowed to use it,because the office would not let a student use the phone till 3 o clock and i couldnt wait that long.My mom went in to go get it back and what happened,it was stolen and on the bill it came to alot of money and so many phone calls were made and when i called my phone this man who sounded like he was in his 30's changed my message.Now i do not know if this is rellevant to the case of cell phones but yeah it just shows we all may need it in our life at some time correct?

So i would say in all cell phone is cases should be allowed and some cases should not.

[Spirited Away]

[font=Arial]Ok i dis-agree with bloomberg for many reasons and one of them because i live in New york.

-Anything could happen at any time,whether its death in your family,lets say you own mom or dad?What if someone needed to contact you to let you know.Not all schools actually take you out of class to let you know.My disagreement is based on that fact of emergency.

I mean sure it IS annoying to have little hoochies or thuggish boys talking on the phone or "key-ing" someone up.

Also someone who has posted in here brang up the topic of disturbance with the cell phones in class.Well as a student my self,yeah it can be a pain in the a** but hey its life.Your the one who has to stay focused no matter what distraction unless its like harmfull in my opinion.And for the teachers,If you see a student doing so,do them the favor and just tell them to get out.Or have them removed,its all about common sense.Like last year in my school i had my cell phone consfiscated because i had to call my dad because it was really important.So my dean saw me with it,and he took it,mind you IT was lunch time,im allowed to use it,because the office would not let a student use the phone till 3 o clock and i couldnt wait that long.My mom went in to go get it back and what happened,it was stolen and on the bill it came to alot of money and so many phone calls were made and when i called my phone this man who sounded like he was in his 30's changed my message.Now i do not know if this is rellevant to the case of cell phones but yeah it just shows we all may need it in our life at some time correct?

So i would say in all cell phone is cases should be allowed and some cases should not.

Schools have plans for "personal emergencies", kids. First thing tomorrow morning, make an appointment or do a quick walk-in to your local conselor and ask him/her about it, please. You all seriously think that schools will keep news of a sudden death of a student's family member until school's out even though the student was contacted by another family member?

Okay, you're saying that high school students just have to deal with such distractions in class. My answer: bullshit. A classroom is a place to learn, not as a place to listen to "it's getting hot in here", "linkin park", and a gazillion other ringtones, have you all forgotten? A classroom isn't the place for cell phones, period. Also, it is up to the student who has the phone to not be a distraction, and NOT anybody else. Why should I be responsible or be the one to take the consequences of another's delinquency? The best way to not be a distraction in class? Don't have 'em at all.

On a last note, here's a tip, though it should have been quite obvious. The next time you lose your phone or suspect that it's been stolen, call to notify your provider and cancel your service for your cell phone number. And if that wasn't obvious to any of you, you should also do the same when your credit cards, check book, drivers license, or the likes get stolen.

[SilentxMage]

Schools have plans for "personal emergencies", kids. First thing tomorrow morning, make an appointment or do a quick walk-in to your local conselor and ask him/her about it, please. You all seriously think that schools will keep news of a sudden death of a student's family member until school's out even though the student was contacted by another family member?

Okay, you're saying that high school students just have to deal with such distractions in class. My answer: bullshit. A classroom is a place to learn, not as a place to listen to "it's getting hot in here", "linkin park", and a gazillion other ringtones, have you all forgotten? A classroom isn't the place for cell phones, period. Also, it is up to the student who has the phone to not be a distraction, and NOT anybody else. Why should I be responsible or be the one to take the consequences of another's delinquency? The best way to not be a distraction in class? Don't have 'em at all.

On a last note, here's a tip, though it should have been quite obvious. The next time you lose your phone or suspect that it's been stolen, call to notify your provider and cancel your service for your cell phone number. And if that wasn't obvious to any of you, you should also do the same when your credit cards, check book, drivers license, or the likes get stolen.

I dont fully agree with you on that.Yeah a classroom is infact a place to learn but this is school we are talking about.NOT every one is gonna be an angel.So obviouslly if the teacher cannot obtain some-what of good behavior from the students,then the teacher isn't fully qualified for the job.Sure they have good teaching method's e.t.c.But they do infact send you to do training in a real class with students to make notes and observe and from-time-to-time teach.So you are going to witness a bunch of asses in a class.Correct?And your right we shouldnt have to be suffering or losing time to learn because of asses.I have to deal with it everyday and i know how people are when they aren't around mom and dad.They tend to get extremly out of hand.And yeah actually i did cancel my account.

-"You all seriously think that schools will keep news of a sudden death of a student's family member until school's out even though the student was contacted by another family member?"You need to open your mind up a bit.This is school we are talking about.Ok lets take a look at a scenario.You are an only child,you mom and dad have NO parents because they already died and they have no brothers or sisters or cousins or aunts.e.t.c. and lets say your mom and dad both died [hopefully not].The school phone isnt working.What then?And if you bring up the fact about neighbors well neighbors dont really always help out.The cops do not have any idea about where you live,what school you go to,or even if you have a child yet.And maybe a friend was there to witness what happened and they needed to call you but the school wont allow you to bring in cell phones.What then?Sure there is email,but what if there is another person with the same first and last name as you spelled exactly alike but no relation what so ever.But people can hardly tell the difference?Then suddenly the power goes off in the school [it happens sometimes honestly].Then nothing powered electrictly in the school can be operated.Then your just screwed,correct?[this may seem drastic but lets just think for a moment,this can actually happen.]

Overally i do agree with what your saying but i have my side to it to.If teachers can have their cell phones ringing off my point is so can we.Whether a distraction or not.


Also i dont think this is all that debatable because theres 2 sides to the story and many scenarios to it.So im 50/50.

[Spirited Away]

I dont fully agree with you on that.Yeah a classroom is infact a place to learn but this is school we are talking about.NOT every one is gonna be an angel.So obviouslly if the teacher cannot obtain some-what of good behavior from the students,then the teacher isn't fully qualified for the job.Sure they have good teaching method's e.t.c.But they do infact send you to do training in a real class with students to make notes and observe and from-time-to-time teach.So you are going to witness a bunch of asses in a class.Correct?And your right we shouldnt have to be suffering or losing time to learn because of asses.I have to deal with it everyday and i know how people are when they aren't around mom and dad.They tend to get extremly out of hand.And yeah actually i did cancel my account.

You said students are not angels, but at the same time, it is not my or other students' responsibility that some are delinquents. Those who are must be punished, obviously. One may have to deal with it as it happens (try to block it out and such), but that doesn't mean that it's one's responsibility to deal with it. You are not obligated to suffer that kind of distraction in school. Again, if cells are banned at school, most kids will take it seriously and not bring their phones to school.

If you cancelled your account, how come you had to pay that huge bill? I'l confuzzled. You mean you eventually cancelled it. Did you file a report with the police?

-"You all seriously think that schools will keep news of a sudden death of a student's family member until school's out even though the student was contacted by another family member?"You need to open your mind up a bit.This is school we are talking about.Ok lets take a look at a scenario.You are an only child,you mom and dad have NO parents because they already died and they have no brothers or sisters or cousins or aunts.e.t.c. and lets say your mom and dad both died [hopefully not].The school phone isnt working.What then?And if you bring up the fact about neighbors well neighbors dont really always help out.The cops do not have any idea about where you live,what school you go to,or even if you have a child yet.And maybe a friend was there to witness what happened and they needed to call you but the school wont allow you to bring in cell phones.What then?Sure there is email,but what if there is another person with the same first and last name as you spelled exactly alike but no relation what so ever.But people can hardly tell the difference?Then suddenly the power goes off in the school [it happens sometimes honestly].Then nothing powered electrictly in the school can be operated.Then your just screwed,correct?[this may seem drastic but lets just think for a moment,this can actually happen.]

You said I should open my mind a bit, how? I went to high school. I know the policies and rules and though they may differ from district to district, they all have procedures for personal emergencies. You can easily figure out a solution if you know what those procedures are.

Your scenerio doesn't make sense. Are you saying that if my parents die, there would be no way I can be contacted? Are you serious? As soon as the police finds out who your parents are and where they live, they can easily find out necessary information to contact you. It may take longer without cell phones, but it will be done just as well. Hello? How did you think these things were dealt with before cell phones? If it so happens that the school's electricity is out, again, it may take longer to contact you, but you will be contacted.

This is silly. You kids seem to think we can't do anything without cell phones. Again, I have to say this kind of thinking is ridiculous, but it is frightening at the same time. Cell phones are conveniences, so when you do not have one, put your thinking cap on and think of an alternative solution.

Overally i do agree with what your saying but i have my side to it to.If teachers can have their cell phones ringing off my point is so can we.Whether a distraction or not.

Teachers have phones ringing off? Really. While I'm sure it happens, I would question the quality of a teacher whose phone rings in class, especially if it rings often.

Also i dont think this is all that debatable because theres 2 sides to the story and many scenarios to it.So im 50/50.

What you just described is a condition for any debate. When there are two opposing view points, a debate is inevitable.

[SilentxMage]

You said students are not angels, but at the same time, it is not my or other students' responsibility that some are delinquents. Those who are must be punished, obviously. One may have to deal with it as it happens (try to block it out and such), but that doesn't mean that it's one's responsibility to deal with it. You are not obligated to suffer that kind of distraction in school. Again, if cells are banned at school, most kids will take it seriously and not bring their phones to school.

If you cancelled your account, how come you had to pay that huge bill? I'l confuzzled. You mean you eventually cancelled it. Did you file a report with the police?
You said I should open my mind a bit, how? I went to high school. I know the policies and rules and though they may differ from district to district, they all have procedures for personal emergencies. You can easily figure out a solution if you know what those procedures are.

Your scenerio doesn't make sense. Are you saying that if my parents die, there would be no way I can be contacted? Are you serious? As soon as the police finds out who your parents are and where they live, they can easily find out necessary information to contact you. It may take longer without cell phones, but it will be done just as well. Hello? How did you think these things were dealt with before cell phones? If it so happens that the school's electricity is out, again, it may take longer to contact you, but you will be contacted.

This is silly. You kids seem to think we can't do anything without cell phones. Again, I have to say this kind of thinking is ridiculous, but it is frightening at the same time. Cell phones are conveniences, so when you do not have one, put your thinking cap on and think of an alternative solution.


Teachers have phones ringing off? Really. While I'm sure it happens, I would question the quality of a teacher whose phone rings in class, especially if it rings often.

What you just described is a condition for any debate. When there are two opposing view points, a debate is inevitable.

What im saying [to make it all clear] is that theres a yes and no why they should be banned.I do beg to differ upon my scenario making since.I think it does if you take the time to actually place your self in the situation.And although you said you went to highschool,that was then and this is now.Im not trying to say there wouldnt be any way possible to be contacted,but what if those ways were blocked off.Hmm?

"You said students are not angels, but at the same time, it is not my or other students' responsibility that some are delinquents. Those who are must be punished, obviously. One may have to deal with it as it happens (try to block it out and such), but that doesn't mean that it's one's responsibility to deal with it. You are not obligated to suffer that kind of distraction in school. Again, if cells are banned at school, most kids will take it seriously and not bring their phones to school. "

Lets look a this thoroughly.A child's biggest responsibilty at school i believe is to learn,not by just the teacher teaching a lesson,but on ones own self will.Alot of people play me and you in my classes and the latest music,yet i make sure to do what i need to do.&&The bunch of idiots may not always be punished.because some teachers cant control or handle them and neither can the authority in most cases handle the idiots.

"Teachers have phones ringing off? Really. While I'm sure it happens, I would question the quality of a teacher whose phone rings in class, especially if it rings often. "

Yeah thats what im saying.If a student especially see's a teacher having his/her cell phone ringing off often.Then yes they will feel obligated to let theirs ring as well.Distraction or no distraction.It is upon the student them self to choose to be distracted or not.

"This is silly. You kids seem to think we can't do anything without cell phones. Again, I have to say this kind of thinking is ridiculous, but it is frightening at the same time. Cell phones are conveniences, so when you do not have one, put your thinking cap on and think of an alternative solution."

I dont think that,though i think most biggest problem with this is emergencies.I mean like today some kid got jumped at my school really really badly.and since even at my school they dont really want the cell phones there,what if someone wanted to jump me and i needed to use my self phone because i had found out during class and needed to use it.Trust me the teacher isnt gonna give a damn till it actually happens.I'm denied of using my cell phone for my own safety.Now what?The teachers also will consfiscate the object and when-ever my parents would come in,thats the only chance i would get it back.Now then my cell phone is now taken away,these kids are going to jump me,the office will not allow me to use the telephone.Now what?If i ask someoen to let me use their cell phone,they will get their's taken away too.Now im not saying that i cant go to the guidance counselor or anything because what they will do is say "well why do you think they are going to jump you" then i am forced to tell them why.Then they will say "hmm,dont worry you will be ok,if anything just come back here if you need me"And they do actually say that.So now i get jumped,im hurt badly.No witnesses around to see that i got jumped.All i can move is my arms and i dont have my cell phone to call my mom.Now what?

[Spirited Away]

What im saying [to make it all clear] is that theres a yes and no why they should be banned.I do beg to differ upon my scenario making since.I think it does if you take the time to actually place your self in the situation.And although you said you went to highschool,that was then and this is now.Im not trying to say there wouldnt be any way possible to be contacted,but what if those ways were blocked off.Hmm?

I am a fair reader, and I like to think that I am a passable writer, so when people say that their writing make sense while I don't understand it, I get a little peeved. I would also say that I am a realist (most of the time), and any example that just beg to be labled as unrealistic doesn't persuade me. But when you asked that I "open my mind" to the situation you pulled out of your , I entertained the notion and responded as I would have if I were in that situation. What else is there?

First you say that you don't believe that I cannot be be contacted, and then you say that if those ways were blocked. I cannot see how I can answer to such a contradiction. If you mean to say I should "open my mind" to the possibility that I can't ever be contacted without the use of a cell phone, sorry, but I cannot. Again, that's silly. Cell phones are not the only way a person can be contacted in emergencies.

I graduated class of 2002; it wasn't that long ago. Please don't get into "that was then, and this is now" because the only difference between us is that I don't rely on conveniences. That's a character difference, not a time difference. I was in two clubs (one being Junior Achievement and the other was Service First), stayed for math tutoring, and missed the late bus on several occasions because of those activities. I didn't whine about not having a cell phone, I just suck it up and went to the office to call for a ride.

Lets look a this thoroughly.A child's biggest responsibilty at school i believe is to learn,not by just the teacher teaching a lesson,but on ones own self will.Alot of people play me and you in my classes and the latest music,yet i make sure to do what i need to do.&&The bunch of idiots may not always be punished.because some teachers cant control or handle them and neither can the authority in most cases handle the idiots.

You said that a child's biggest responsibility is to learn, then you say kids play music in class, which is what they shouldn't be doing but they are doing it anyway. It's not an issue of what they're doing, it's an issue of what's there to stop them from doing it, which is to place a ban and enforce punishments on violators. That's been my argument all along. Authority can handle it, again, it is the problem of the quality of the authority and that's not what we're here to argue. Or else, we'd get into qualifications of teachers and I'd go off to off-topic lala-land.

"Teachers have phones ringing off? Really. While I'm sure it happens, I would question the quality of a teacher whose phone rings in class, especially if it rings often. "

Yeah thats what im saying.If a student especially see's a teacher having his/her cell phone ringing off often.Then yes they will feel obligated to let theirs ring as well.Distraction or no distraction.It is upon the student them self to choose to be distracted or not.

Again you miss the point, which is that there shouldn't be opportunies for distractions in the classroom in the first place.

"This is silly. You kids seem to think we can't do anything without cell phones. Again, I have to say this kind of thinking is ridiculous, but it is frightening at the same time. Cell phones are conveniences, so when you do not have one, put your thinking cap on and think of an alternative solution."

I dont think that,though i think most biggest problem with this is emergencies.I mean like today some kid got jumped at my school really really badly.and since even at my school they dont really want the cell phones there,what if someone wanted to jump me and i needed to use my self phone because i had found out during class and needed to use it.Trust me the teacher isnt gonna give a damn till it actually happens.I'm denied of using my cell phone for my own safety.Now what?The teachers also will consfiscate the object and when-ever my parents would come in,thats the only chance i would get it back.Now then my cell phone is now taken away,these kids are going to jump me,the office will not allow me to use the telephone.Now what?If i ask someoen to let me use their cell phone,they will get their's taken away too.Now im not saying that i cant go to the guidance counselor or anything because what they will do is say "well why do you think they are going to jump you" then i am forced to tell them why.Then they will say "hmm,dont worry you will be ok,if anything just come back here if you need me"And they do actually say that.So now i get jumped,im hurt badly.No witnesses around to see that i got jumped.All i can move is my arms and i dont have my cell phone to call my mom.Now what?

Again, again, again, how did you think we dealt with these problems before the popularization of cell phones. If you think a cell is going to save you during an emergency, go back and read my arguments before you. There are statstics that say cell phones cause accidents. There are stories about people talking on cell phones who didn't noticed they were being stalked. There are real stories about cell phones causing emergencies. They are as helpful as they are dangerous.

It's laughable that you think a cell phone can save you from getting jumped. If you couldn't get an adult to help you in person, how are you going to call someone and have them help you? By the time that the person comes along, you're already dead, my dear.

As I've said so before, you don't need a cell phone in those cases. You need a friend.

[SilentxMage]

I am a fair reader, and I like to think that I am a passable writer, so when people say that their writing make sense while I don't understand it, I get a little peeved. I would also say that I am a realist (most of the time), and any example that just beg to be labled as unrealistic doesn't persuade me. But when you asked that I "open my mind" to the situation you pulled out of your , I entertained the notion and responded as I would have if I were in that situation. What else is there?

First you say that you don't believe that I cannot be be contacted, and then you say that if those ways were blocked. I cannot see how I can answer to such a contradiction. If you mean to say I should "open my mind" to the possibility that I can't ever be contacted without the use of a cell phone, sorry, but I cannot. Again, that's silly. Cell phones are not the only way a person can be contacted in emergencies.

I graduated class of 2002; it wasn't that long ago. Please don't get into "that was then, and this is now" because the only difference between us is that I don't rely on conveniences. That's a character difference, not a time difference. I was in two clubs (one being Junior Achievement and the other was Service First), stayed for math tutoring, and missed the late bus on several occasions because of those activities. I didn't whine about not having a cell phone, I just suck it up and went to the office to call for a ride.
You said that a child's biggest responsibility is to learn, then you say kids play music in class, which is what they shouldn't be doing but they are doing it anyway. It's not an issue of what they're doing, it's an issue of what's there to stop them from doing it, which is to place a ban and enforce punishments on violators. That's been my argument all along. Authority can handle it, again, it is the problem of the quality of the authority and that's not what we're here to argue. Or else, we'd get into qualifications of teachers and I'd go off to off-topic lala-land.
Again you miss the point, which is that there shouldn't be opportunies for distractions in the classroom in the first place.
Again, again, again, how did you think we dealt with these problems before the popularization of cell phones. If you think a cell is going to save you during an emergency, go back and read my arguments before you. There are statstics that say cell phones cause accidents. There are stories about people talking on cell phones who didn't noticed they were being stalked. There are real stories about cell phones causing emergencies. They are as helpful as they are dangerous.

It's laughable that you think a cell phone can save you from getting jumped. If you couldn't get an adult to help you in person, how are you going to call someone and have them help you? By the time that the person comes along, you're already dead, my dear.

As I've said so before, you don't need a cell phone in those cases. You need a friend.

"I graduated class of 2002; it wasn't that long ago. Please don't get into "that was then, and this is now" because the only difference between us is that I don't rely on conveniences. That's a character difference, not a time difference. I was in two clubs (one being Junior Achievement and the other was Service First), stayed for math tutoring, and missed the late bus on several occasions because of those activities. I didn't whine about not having a cell phone, I just suck it up and went to the office to call for a ride."

I didnt want you to take it that way.But im not getting into that.And sure i agree with you on cell phones do bring emergencies.

"It's laughable that you think a cell phone can save you from getting jumped. If you couldn't get an adult to help you in person, how are you going to call someone and have them help you? By the time that the person comes along, you're already dead, my dear."

Im guessing you lived in a white area.Just a thought,dont go thinking im racist.But actually a cell phone can save you fromg getting jumped.Well the story if that was me in a situation like that,my mom is very crazy and just becauses shes 39,she will fight who ever.Not to bring this up but we've lived in the worst places of new york.The real bad ones and she knows how it is and she doesnt play that.And neither do i.The difference bewtween an adult in person than a person over the phone.The person in a case will think that the child is being over dramatic.Trust me i know how people are and i've been in a situation that no one has helped but just stared.Now calling a friend or relative,they will be there for you at any case because thats what they do.Ok.And honestly dont gimme that by the time they get there,your already dead stuff because i dont believe you die because your hurt i believe you die because you give in.Anyway lets not get into that.

"You need a friend"

I take offense to that and to give you some info about me i do have friends hun.

"Again you miss the point, which is that there shouldn't be opportunies for distractions in the classroom in the first place.
Again, again, again, how did you think we dealt with these problems before the popularization of cell phones. If you think a cell is going to save you during an emergency, go back and read my arguments before you. There are statstics that say cell phones cause accidents. There are stories about people talking on cell phones who didn't noticed they were being stalked. There are real stories about cell phones causing emergencies. They are as helpful as they are dangerous. "

I do not doubt that.Your missing my point.You cannot control anyone no matter who you are.And either way without cell phones,There still will be distractions.

"You said that a child's biggest responsibility is to learn, then you say kids play music in class, which is what they shouldn't be doing but they are doing it anyway. It's not an issue of what they're doing, it's an issue of what's there to stop them from doing it, which is to place a ban and enforce punishments on violators. That's been my argument all along. Authority can handle it, again, it is the problem of the quality of the authority and that's not what we're here to argue. Or else, we'd get into qualifications of teachers and I'd go off to off-topic lala-land."

But they will do it anyway.You cannot stop them.No matter the situation.They will do it anyway.I u nderstand you are saying that they shouldnt have it to begin with.Well honeslty thats on you.People have personal issues going on that you may not even know about.Also if the cell phone does happen to ring off from a call,you may not know if its important or not.Thats why we need trust and stop trying to thinking upon a one way road and open up to many possibilites whether you think it is realistic or un-realistic.And i disagree with you about authority.They will not always have control over a human being.Even if they had a gun to their face,no chance in most cases.So if your saying we should have more rules/punishments.Do you really think that will help?The more you try to stop them from doing it,the more they are going to do it.Through my experiences i know for sure that even banning cell phones will not help.There are many many ways to hide things.My point on banning and enforcing punishments is that it will not always help.But i will say this,the more subjective people become on rules the more people will think ahead of what to do in the situation.

"First you say that you don't believe that I cannot be be contacted, and then you say that if those ways were blocked. I cannot see how I can answer to such a contradiction. If you mean to say I should "open my mind" to the possibility that I can't ever be contacted without the use of a cell phone, sorry, but I cannot. Again, that's silly. Cell phones are not the only way a person can be contacted in emergencies."

No,What i said was if they ban cell phones then you cannot be contacted.If it is confiscated you cannot be contacted.To what i said about options being blocked off,it is reffering to schools being prepared for emergencies.

"I was in two clubs (one being Junior Achievement and the other was Service First), stayed for math tutoring, and missed the late bus on several occasions because of those activities. I didn't whine about not having a cell phone, I just suck it up and went to the office to call for a ride."

Well your school may not be like mines,or the next persons.Thats another point im trying to make.To me and only to me i think you are looking at it from your experiences.We are not whining either we are simply fighting for our rights.

"If you mean to say I should "open my mind" to the possibility that I can't ever be contacted without the use of a cell phone, sorry, but I cannot. Again, that's silly. Cell phones are not the only way a person can be contacted in emergencies."

So from the scenario i placed my self into.What am i apose to do,yell for someone to help me?Lets be honest here,in public,people see you on the floor they will step over you.From the two scenarios i gave i listed my point on the subject of emergencies.

I want this to stay civil by all means.I dont want you to think i am an ass who's stuck on thinking cell phones are the only way people can be contacted during emergencies but is many cases thaat will be the only option.Thats all.Now if anything i said in this post does not make since i apologize because i was distracted many many times.