Upper Classmen Privileges, One got taken away, is this fair? Options

[cassjamminx]

Okay so at my school, as another way to show uppclassmen (Junior & Senior), and lowerclassmen (Fresh & Soph), we have bottom & top lockers.

Lowerclassmen obviously get bottom lockers, and uppclassmen obviously get top lockers.

And this year, as I enter Junior year, at orientation they happily state that "To end all confusion of the office reassigning lockers, we decided to keep the locker the same this year."

SO just because they're lazy- us Juniors lose one of our upper classmen privileges and have a bottom locker ONCE again. And probably for senior year too.

But what really sucks is that, the empty top lockers from the Seniors LAST year, go to the INCOMING FRESHMEN this year. *Why can't we get those, and freshmen get ours?*

Tell me that's not unfair?

We complained (yesterday was just orientation really) that it's not fair and stuff and all the assistant principal said was that "It's the 21st century, enjoy the change & the exercise of bending down." The principal said that "You don't know how easier this is for us not having to reassign lockers and combinations." Why can't we just bring in our own locks & combos, and they just assign numbers?

*mad* Sorry that this was long.

[stpetestunna]

I must say, when it comes to my school the lockers are so oddly well (it's supposed to be luck of the draw), most of the time tall people have top lockers.

Also, the past two years it's been very odd seeing that almost everyone who had a top or bottom locker last year has the same this year. Sadly, the bottom group includes me. I had #350 in 9th, currently have #188 in 10th

I hate bottom lockers sadly, all the kneeling down and having to wait or jam myself between groups, it sucks. But my school does nothing about it, all they say is "look, we have all the lockers set up and none can be changed. Sorry".

350 sucked last year, and 188 is atrocious