Was the moon landing forreal? Options

[think!IMAGINARIL...]

There was a topic like this before, but that one is dead and over two years old.. I thought that it needed a fresh start. Besides, most of the people who posted in it are inactive.
http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=12400

If you don't know about this, you can go to Wikipedia and research it.

I still have not made up my mind yet, but I sort of think that it was all a hoax.

So.. Do you think it was real or is it a conspiracy?

[*Infinite.*]

We were discussing this in science class, I'm in a honors one so its free for debating within class unlike the normal one which is kind of odd. We were talking about how some people would like them to broadcast it once again, although NASA I think it is says that they don't need to because its already been done. I personally would find it neat to see it be done again, but since their refusing to do so I think it was just set. Like that red-bull commercial. If anyone has seen that, its kind of stupid but oh well.

I think it was fake, personally. If they were to shoot it again I may find it a little more realistic.


I'm going to read up on it more too.

[think!IMAGINARIL...]

I think it was fake, personally. If they were to shoot it again I may find it a little more realistic.

What do you mean by that? Do you mean like.. filming it again and then broadcasting it?

Does this look real to me? i don’t think so. haha.

I don’t think program like Photoshop existed back in the 50s.

They probably just covered up the back if the studio with a black background..

NASA probably didn’t have enough solid facts and evidence to prove it.

I hear they're supposed to have a mirror on the surface of the moon that reflects things.. Like they use a laser pointer and it reflects back. But I'd have to see it for myself to believe it.

Thursday, July 13, 2006: The original high-quality video tapes of Apollo 11, which were apparently sent by NASA to the National Archives and then were returned to the Goddard Space Flight Center, have gone missing (see the pdf by John M. Sarkissian). The quality of the video broadcast to the world on television was of much, much lower quality than the video originally received – or manufactured! - by NASA. Obviously, if you were going to fake the moon landing, you might have a motive to ‘lose’ the high-quality tapes, where artifacts of faking could be seen. This was by far the biggest moment in the American space program. You’d think they would care about hanging on to the evidence.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm

I found that pretty interesting.. That website is very one-sided though. It doesn't explain the other half of the story.