save the la mesa, our water, our life Options

[rockmyx]

12 MILLION PEOPLE IN METRO MANILA DEPEND ON

THE LA MESA RESERVOIR FOR WATER


PLEASE HELP KEEP IT SAFE AND CLEAN





add your voice to the campaign to preserve the La Mesa watersheld. join the signature campaign asking the government.


by signing the petition below, you are opposing the privatizing of the 59 hectere portion of the La Mesa reservoir, wherein a housing project will be built, thus endagering the integrity of the metro manila's water supply. Join the various organization in the La Mesa coalition in asking the government to exhaust all the means to find a just solution to the rights of the awardees / claimants of the 59 hectare land, without prejudicing the rights of 12 million metro manila residents to clean water.




please log-in to

Link Removed
for more info



or text

Text information removed

This post has been edited by iRock cB: Sep 23 2006, 09:56 AM

[smoke]

^ Well I wasn't sure so better safe than sorry, haha. I'll be sure and ask an admin for you though.

Have you perhaps tried to start a petition?

Didn't think I'd have to explain this but I meant in his town. I think he'd get a much better response with that as opposed to an Internet petition.

And yes, that is advertising. Sorry, but rules are rules.

I thought that adverting personal websites was what the rule was trying to prevent.

No, sorry. You have that backwards. Personal website are ok. Anything else is not.

Anyways, let's help him with some ideas. This topic is about his towns water problem, not what advertising is and isn't. If you'd like to discuss that, PM me where it is appropriate, not in this topic where it's spam. If anyone is interested, feel free to PM him or give him some ideas in here.

[*mipadi*]

No, sorry. You have that backwards. Personal website are ok. Anything else is not.

What's the logic behind that? From what I can tell, the rule is in place to prevent a hundred threads like "Check out my Xanga" and "Check out my MySpace". If this is the case, then a) it's the stupidest rule I've ever heard; and b) it goes against the entire spirit of the Internet. Part of the spirit of the Web is being able to easily distribute links. If cB is trying to prevent that, then it's a pretty stupid website.