Strip Search Bill |
Debate Rules
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
- Topics are not to bash others.
- Immature behaviors/comments will not be tolerated.
- Please remember, not everyone thinks like you. People have different ways of thinking and different perspectives. Let's respect each other's thoughts and responses.
- PLEASE, search before making new topics--especially popular topics like "God" and "Abortion" etc.
- PLEASE, read through the thread or at least a couple pages before posting. We have to maintain a certain level of maturity in here.
 Sep 22 2006, 10:16 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051  |
Alright so the House of Representatives has just passed a bill (it's now moving onto senate) called "The Student Teacher Safety Act of 2005" which gives teachers the right to perform warrantless strip searches with only the smallest suspicion that just one student brought drugs to school. The searches could take the form of pat-downs, bag searches, or strip searches depending on how administrators interpret the law. The bill will become mandatory for all schools with federal funding.
What do you think about this? Is it violating our rights or is it worth giving that up for protection? You can find the article here |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
rawr SOCK Oh, wow.
That's like in violation of the Const... Sep 22 2006, 10:23 PM Gypsy Eyes In theory it's to keep "their children sa... Sep 22 2006, 10:25 PM rawr SOCK Yeah.
It's more focused on the illegal drugs ... Sep 22 2006, 10:29 PM Gypsy Eyes So you're saying random, warrantless search an... Sep 22 2006, 10:32 PM rawr SOCK I'm not saying that it's ok.
I'm just ... Sep 22 2006, 10:38 PM Gypsy Eyes How exactly would it protect us though? Even if th... Sep 22 2006, 10:39 PM Spirited Away I'd be surprised, very surprised (and angry) i... Sep 22 2006, 10:43 PM rawr SOCK It would protect us because like..
Ok. Lets say p... Sep 22 2006, 10:49 PM Gypsy Eyes So what you're saying is that it's protect... Sep 22 2006, 10:53 PM rawr SOCK Maybe it would protect everyone.
The dealers from ... Sep 22 2006, 10:59 PM Gypsy Eyes That's exactly my point. It doesn't protec... Sep 22 2006, 11:03 PM
sakaitone QUOTE(Gypsy Eyes @ Sep 23 2006, 12:03 AM)... Sep 23 2006, 12:21 PM Spiritual Winged Aura WTF. where's our privacy and respect? Sep 23 2006, 01:30 AM kryogenix Strip Search Bill? Ewww, Who wants to see Bill Cli... Sep 23 2006, 09:05 AM rawr SOCK Why not just get drug sniffing dogs? Sep 23 2006, 12:32 PM minixchopstix QUOTE(rawr SOCK @ Sep 23 2006, 10:32 AM) ... Sep 23 2006, 04:19 PM Spiritual Winged Aura QUOTE(rawr SOCK @ Sep 23 2006, 10:32 AM) ... Sep 23 2006, 06:19 PM rawr SOCK Do the police have things to detect drugs? Other t... Sep 23 2006, 06:26 PM Spiritual Winged Aura QUOTE(rawr SOCK @ Sep 23 2006, 4:26 PM) D... Sep 23 2006, 10:08 PM rawr SOCK Err. What do you mean by that?
The dogs or.. ?
... Sep 23 2006, 11:39 PM Gypsy Eyes They could issue a warrant for a strip search. The... Sep 23 2006, 07:26 PM Spirited Away QUOTE(Gypsy Eyes @ Sep 23 2006, 7:26 PM) ... Sep 23 2006, 08:35 PM Gypsy Eyes QUOTE(Spirited Away @ Sep 23 2006, 9:35 P... Sep 24 2006, 11:47 AM Spiritual Winged Aura Not dogs ;] Sep 24 2006, 02:09 AM rawr SOCK Ok..
Then what do you mean? Sep 24 2006, 08:06 AM Spiritual Winged Aura QUOTE(rawr SOCK @ Sep 24 2006, 6:06 AM) O... Sep 24 2006, 06:26 PM rawr SOCK What about crystal meth, cocaine, and angel dust?
... Sep 24 2006, 06:29 PM Spiritual Winged Aura Yep. Animals are sentitive.
cocaine would fall un... Sep 24 2006, 08:35 PM  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: