official members lounge |
official members lounge |
Sep 18 2006, 12:29 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
okay, it's been suggested before, and i'm bringing it up again.
why can't we have an official member's lounge? it'd be a lot easier to keep good (just de-official member problem people), and would provide incentive for being an official member. if you're going to say that people will spam to get in, well, people do that already for official member tools. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 19 2006, 11:19 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
yes, everything you say is valid.
but you have not shown that trying it out will be harmful. and, i assume, you agree there could be benefits. |
|
|
|
| *mipadi* |
Sep 20 2006, 01:33 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Guest |
and, i assume, you agree there could be benefits. Not really. What's the issue here? The issue is that a lot of discussion on cB is dull and boring. Is that because official members are afraid to post? In other words, would giving official members their own forum increase the level of interesting discussion? If the answer is no, then such a forum is pointless; if the answer is yes, then I ask why it's not already occurring in The Lounge? I don't exactly see official members fighting to make interesting, engaging topics. Adding a special forum for official members brings up a simple logistics issue. If official members post only in their own lounge, it removes discussion from the general Lounge, and creates a schism in the interaction between members and official members. If official members want to include members, then they a) have to post in The Lounge, negating the purpose of their own lounge; or b) post in both places, which creates a chaotic, split discussion which isn't conducive to real discussion anyway. Beyond that point, it creates an atmosphere where official members are considered more "important" than members, which is ridiculous, because a) it's not hard to become an official member; and b) official members don't have any additional responsibilities, so why consider them more important to the community? I don't see the purpose in splitting up the two groups. Ideas like this have been proposed before. It was once proposed that Debate be made a privileged forum, for instance; seemingly the only reason was to weed out "undesirable" debaters. I'm generally opposed to any idea that attempts to needlessly raise certain members above other members. The idea of an official members-only lounge is such an idea, because it has no benefits (and in fact only creates problems). Simply put, it hasn't been shown or demonstrated in any way that The Lounge lacks engaging discussion because members are allowed to post in it. There's no evidence pointing to the fact that official members as a collective whole are trying to have engaging discussion, but are getting drowned out in the tumult. And the problem with trying it is obvious: It's easy to add forums, but very difficult to take them away. Remember when Jusun removed a bunch of forums? The backlash from that went on for several months; and ultimately, one of the removed forums (Current Events) was re-added, thanks to the backlash. |
|
|
|
sadolakced acid official members lounge Sep 18 2006, 12:29 AM
suddenly she what would be so special about the official member... Sep 18 2006, 12:33 AM
mipadi I've long been against this, for a number of r... Sep 18 2006, 12:43 AM
Azarel I'm with Michael on this one.
With only seven... Sep 18 2006, 01:11 AM
Smoogrish QUOTE(Azarel @ Sep 18 2006, 2:11 AM) I... Sep 18 2006, 08:34 PM
Spiritual Winged Aura cB will lose it activity Sep 18 2006, 02:04 AM
icy_wonderland I don't like this idea...it's quite unfair... Sep 18 2006, 06:28 AM
sadolakced acid please note that i don't mean a just make the ... Sep 18 2006, 08:20 PM
mipadi QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Sep 18 2006, 9:20... Sep 18 2006, 09:37 PM
Azarel So.. what would be posted in the exclusive lounge ... Sep 18 2006, 08:23 PM
digital.fragrance That would be fun! I think that a lounge like... Sep 18 2006, 08:30 PM
KissMe2408 The upside of this, is that it would inspire more ... Sep 18 2006, 08:42 PM
mona lisa How would this be any different than a Lounge for ... Sep 18 2006, 09:13 PM
sadolakced acid then what, pray tell, is the point of a random dis... Sep 18 2006, 11:11 PM
mipadi QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Sep 19 2006, 12:1... Sep 18 2006, 11:20 PM
sadolakced acid elitism creates conflict, conflict creates drama, ... Sep 18 2006, 11:39 PM
mipadi QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Sep 19 2006, 12:3... Sep 18 2006, 11:42 PM
sadolakced acid which can, in turn, stimulate interst. although t... Sep 18 2006, 11:52 PM
Schizophreak I think this is a good idea.
- It might motivate ... Sep 19 2006, 08:33 AM
mipadi I still don't see the need to create a new for... Sep 19 2006, 09:00 AM
Schizophreak ^Exactly. There's no danger in trying it. I me... Sep 20 2006, 08:41 AM
Quarantine. I like this idea.
I think it would be very cool, a... Sep 20 2006, 03:07 PM
Schizophreak ^Why thank you.
I agree with everything you say, ... Sep 20 2006, 10:58 PM
sadolakced acid michael, here's a simple question:
Is it true... Sep 20 2006, 11:23 PM![]() ![]() |