Federal Assault Weapons Ban |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Federal Assault Weapons Ban |
| *Kathleen* |
Sep 18 2006, 07:49 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guest |
Before anyone jumps down my throat about repeated topics, I realize that there's a thread on guns already; however, it didn't really discuss the FAWB (hehe.. fawb
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 18 2006, 11:14 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
no.
the right to bear arms as encompassed in the second ammendment does not specifically reference the use of small arms for hunting or personal protection. rather, it references that a militia being nessicary for the preservation of a free state, the right to bear arms will not be infringed upon. therefore, we can clearly see the second ammendment does not just encompass small arms, but all military arms. so, all military grade arms, cannons, tanks, and aircraft included should be protected under the 2nd ammendment. i don't believe that these things should be made avalible; i merely believe this is what the constitition says. |
|
|
|
Kathleen Federal Assault Weapons Ban Sep 18 2006, 07:49 PM
kryogenix No! Not at the federal level, and not at the s... Sep 19 2006, 08:51 AM
Kathleen Okay whew. I brought this up because we discussed ... Sep 19 2006, 08:24 PM
RubeTheCube I took a look at the wikipedia article about the F... Sep 19 2006, 09:02 PM
sadolakced acid the 2nd ammendment is not outdated.
at the time o... Sep 19 2006, 11:29 PM
mipadi QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Sep 20 2006, 12:2... Sep 20 2006, 09:37 AM
sadolakced acid i don't see how that affects the discussion. Sep 20 2006, 11:27 PM
mipadi QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Sep 21 2006, 12:2... Sep 21 2006, 12:04 AM
sadolakced acid and this militia is expected to defend our country... Sep 21 2006, 09:38 PM![]() ![]() |