Can you prove that the Bible is authentic? That there's truely no Contradictions, If there even 1 contradiction, the Bible is not authentic. Options

[illriginal]

Can you guys prove these contradictions to be false? Here's your challenge, prove to me and everyone else that the Bible is not false and misleading to the truth of God and his prophets.


Here's your big resource of Biblical contradictions:
http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/

[Kontroll]

Islam, eh? Well, if you look at the Christian Bible, you will find alot more consistencies than not. First of all to just get the over all story of the Bible is amazing. The people who wrote it didn't even know eachother. It's not like they got together and conspired about writing this book that would, and has changed the world.

Firstly, the Trinity is logical. As humans we think that 1+1+1=3. Well, yes it does, but actually when we see the Trinity figure it's more like they hold different offices. There's God the Father. God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. All three offices held by one being. Is that clear?

Secondly, considering you have a faith you understand that the world was created, yes? Who created it? Well, according to Christianity, our God is a personal God. He never had to create a world to have a relationship, but He did. God is a relationship. There's a Father, Son and Holy Spirit. There's a relationship right there for you. He wants to have a relationship with us.

Now, the god of Islam is a monad. That means that he's basically a one dimentional being. To create a world full of humans who depend on relationships and look to Allah as god would make Allah inconsistent. He would not be all powerful because in order to have a relationship with your god he would have to change to fit his own creation, and not the other way around.

The Bible has over 6,000 manuscripts. The chances that they have passages inconsistent with eachother are very slim. It's a book of truth. It's history. Come on. We can just see that from the stories of Exodus, and the Babolonian Captivity. They were actual historical events. To prove that the Bible is completely inconsistent would take a long time. Considering that you're skeptical of it to begin with, you wouldn't believe the evidence even if it was handed to you. So, there really is no point to this topic than to make Christianity seem fallible.

Why don't you do the research yourself. That's what the Bible says. Interpret it your own way and find out what I'm(God) saying to you. We as humans are born with this knowing that there is a god out there. Why do you think the earliest civilizations believed in something. They believed in the animism. At least it was something. They believed there was a god out there. But we know that animism is false because everything is interconnected if you look at it. The sun gives us heat and energy, and the plants give us oxygen, and the water gives life to the plants, and so forth. If things depend on eachother to survive, then there would have to be a god in order for it all to work.

[AngelinaTaylor]

It's history. Come on. We can just see that from the stories of Exodus, and the Babolonian Captivity. They were actual historical events.

Um, no they're not. Historians and archeologists actually doubt that the Exodus ever happened. There is not ONE piece of evidence that somebody wondered in the desert for FORTY years. Other stories as well - such as Noah's ark.

And Tamacracker - stop using sites as your arguments. Are you really that unintelligent that you can't read and interpret these? If you don't care to read them, why should we? Seriously.