css or html and tables??? |
 Sep 5 2006, 09:45 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Senior Member  Group: Member Posts: 56 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 454,246  |
my hard drive crashed and i lost my dreamweaver files for my website layout...since i have to start from scratch im wondering if i should create my site with tables and html or suck it up and try to get better with css...?? what are the benefits of css vs html??
|
|
|
|
 |
Replies
| *[2]Nekked* |
Sep 5 2006, 08:22 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
it's a preference.
some would argue that css > tables but other people like tables > css. do what best fits you. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
rubicon css or html and tables??? Sep 5 2006, 09:45 AM
mipadi CSS isn't a replacement for HTML; rather, HTML... Sep 5 2006, 11:01 AM
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: