should pluto be a planet?, come and express your feelngs toward this matter |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
should pluto be a planet?, come and express your feelngs toward this matter |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() when_ur_gone_who's_ganna_save_me ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 66 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 446,377 ![]() |
do you think pluto shoulkd be a planet?
come and discuss it eith people who share you interest |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
It's semantics.
pluto could very well be a planet without adding the other three. It is in my book. why? well, the simple fact that it is nessicary to define what a planet is makes it purely semantics. There is no arguement over the tempurature water boils, becuase something happens. what's the mass at which a solar object becomes a planet? there is no set point. What they have defined is a simple set of rules, like, about how to tell if water is scalding. it's all semantics. there is no scientific reason pluto should not be a planet- planets don't have any greater effect on the solar system than other things, per mass. two weeks ago, they defined all the "dwarf planets" as full planets. why? it's semantics. there is no "where do you draw the line". Don't draw a line. admit or reject planets individually. no line is needed. stop seeking one. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |