35 mm |
35 mm |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
35 mm rocks.
BW 35 mm rocks extra. i want to have a darkroom. i want my own enlarger. i want a canon rebel or similar camera 35 mm beats out digital in sex appeal. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 ![]() |
manual everything is the way to go, you have so much control over the shot.
Digital photography is taking the art out of photgraphy. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
Digital photography is taking the art out of photgraphy. I would largely have to disagree. Digital doesn't take away or eliminate the art of photography, I just don't see that. You can have all the technical abilities and expertise in the field of manual film and photography, but without true vision, where are you? I don't feel persuaded in the idea that the more technical and manual complexity used in photography the more artistic a photograph would be. Also, don't forget the large variety of benefits to digital photography, and the new horizons of control one could have over their lens. These benefits are no more real than in cinematography, but I would still argue their existence in still photography. Granted, manual photography has its benefits, but I don't exactly see how diverging from that technology into a new one kills the art. In fact, I find such a presumption rather insulting. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |