cB layouts have gone to the dogs. |
cB layouts have gone to the dogs. |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() oooh yeah. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,333 Joined: Feb 2006 Member No: 376,533 ![]() |
MySpace layouts in particular. Here are examples:
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/download.php?id=13386 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/download.php?id=13385 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/download.php?id=13384 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/download.php?id=13383 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/download.php?id=13382 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/download.php?id=13364 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/download.php?id=13299 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/download.php?id=13181 What the hell? How on earth did those get through the queue? Those are piss poor. And those aren't even all of them! It's basically taking an image from Google, adding a few brushes, putting it through a generator, adjusting the code a little and submitting it. Is that what cB layouts have come to be? Has our design staff become a bunch of rubber stamps? (Not trying to attack you, but look at those layouts!) Please, prove me wrong. If need be, please add more links. |
|
|
![]() |
*Azarel* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
In general? Better.
The house cleaning threads in each of the resource forums could stand to be unpinned/deleted. ![]() Also, question--do design moderators only look at the screenshot before accepting a layout, or do they actually make sure that the coding is valid? I ask because while the screenshot appears perfectly fine, the coding for this particular skin is.. pretty bad to the point where if you use the provided coding as is, the layout doesn't show up. :\ |
|
|
*digital.fragrance* |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Guest ![]() |
In general? Better. The house cleaning threads in each of the resource forums could stand to be unpinned/deleted. ![]() Also, question--do design moderators only look at the screenshot before accepting a layout, or do they actually make sure that the coding is valid? I ask because while the screenshot appears perfectly fine, the coding for this particular skin is.. pretty bad to the point where if you use the provided coding as is, the layout doesn't show up. :\ It looks fine in IE for me... Yeah, we click the layouts to make sure it actually works - there were a bunch that no longer worked because the blog went through a slight re-coding after it was submitted. |
|
|
*Azarel* |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Guest ![]() |
It looks fine in IE for me... Like I said in that thread, come time to insert coding and view it on an actual livejournal, it does not work in either browser. Case in point: http://aznhellbringer.livejournal.com Mkay? 'kay.
Yeah, we click the layouts to make sure it actually works - there were a bunch that no longer worked because the blog went through a slight re-coding after it was submitted. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() show me a garden thats bursting to life ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 ![]() |
And who the heck are you? ^
Like I said in that thread, come time to insert coding and view it on an actual livejournal, it does not work in either browser. Case in point: http://aznhellbringer.livejournal.com Mkay? 'kay. It doesn't work because it's made for Greatest Journal. Sure the coding looks the same but i'll be somewhere somehow LJ coding vs. GJ coding is different. |
|
|
*Azarel* |
![]()
Post
#6
|
Guest ![]() |
It doesn't work because it's made for Greatest Journal. Sure the coding looks the same but i'll be somewhere somehow LJ coding vs. GJ coding is different. GreatestJournal is based off of LiveJournal because LiveJournal is an open source project, but apparently it allows screwed up coding. :( Background doesn't appear on FF, but looks fine in IE on GJ (http://totalkaos.greatestjournal.com). Boo.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |