Most Overrated Movie |
Most Overrated Movie |
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
What would you say would be the most overrated movie ever?
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Lyrical Genius: Watch 4 AND!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 574 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 22,616 ![]() |
Spiderman, Matrix (YES ALL OF 'EM), Titanic, Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, Independence Day, and hundreds of other movies but I can't think of any right now
I think the Ring was hot whether or not it was scary though |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() L!ckitySplit ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 4,325 Joined: Apr 2005 Member No: 129,329 ![]() |
Spiderman, Matrix (YES ALL OF 'EM), Titanic, Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, Independence Day, and hundreds of other movies but I can't think of any right now I think the Ring was hot whether or not it was scary though you dissed all those movies, yet you like the RING? you just killed all your credibility lol. I couldn't agree more haha. It's a classic. I guess it doesn't appeal to the short attention span of todays teens. And the fact that you actually have to THINK to understand and put it all together. It's a brilliant trilogy. I know it's been mentioned, but Titanic was so ridiculous. Ok, I liked the movie but it isn't OMFG LIKE THebEsT mOvIe EVAR!!!!!1!3 People went insane over that movie when it was in theatres. could this guy be more right? its almost creepy. I just had to. I like to see the rant again. Lord of the Rings...? A classic? Are you out of your f**king mind. It's hollywood bullshit. Far far far from a classic, my friend. It hasn't even been given the test of time yet. To call it a classic, either way, is still premature. Not to mention, I have a huge attention span. I watch, and enjoy, plently of true classic epics (We're talking David Lean circa 1960's). I have a deep love within me for many a slow-burning horror film. Attention is not an issue. But, in all honesty, there isn't anything really to pay attention to in this trilogy, let alone anything worth attention. Also, I can't really recall any amount of serious brain work for this one. In fact, it's a pretty uniform dumb-downed-big-time-hollywood-super-pedestrian-work. It has very little depth. It works in very defined moral lines. Its characters are amazingly under developed (almost to an insulting degree) for such a long trilogy. The special effects are bombastic. In all honesty, the film has little to nothing to offer. It appeals to simpletons, and that is why so many people adore it. That is why it is highly reguarded, and for near the same reasons that Star Wars has become an overrated work, Lord of the Rings is very much overrated. It doesn't take much thinking. It isn't very complex, smart, or progressive. And, in the end, it offers really nothing new to film, nor does it really do any kind of impressive job in its retro-rehasing. It's boring because it has nothing to offer, not because it is long. Want to watcha movie where you have "THINK?" Try an Ingmar Bergman film, or if that isn't enough for you, try putting together the biographical masterpiece that is Naked Lunch. [Note: Before your beloved Peter Jackson started smoking Hollywood cock, he made interesting, honest, and awesome movies. Try Heavenly Creatures, Bad Taste, and Dead Alive. Yeah, same Jackson. Whole other passion.] well, it musta won 16 academy awards for a reason. its either i believe an academy. or a teenager that likes movies nobody ever heard of. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |