macs suck., pcs rule. |
macs suck., pcs rule. |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
well, really, it's just a friendly mac v pc thread, and i know it's been posted before, but really, more people will click here if i name it 'macs suck'
my beef with macs- i used mac OS way back when. bad experiences. not too much a legitimate reason today, but a reason none the less. but the major one: proprietary. i don't know about now, but i know before that everything apple makes, they make it proprietary if they can. for example, a PC owner can easily upgrade thier optical drive. they could pop in some more memory, or add in a new sound card. now, sure, mac hardware may be good already, but you won't deny it's not the best, that would be much too expensive. and as time goes by, it means the only way to upgrade is with a totally new computer. i mean, sure, it works fine for people who don't want to be bothered to upgrade thier computers, and for the average user, macs are probably pretty good. but i can't be hassled to buy a new comptuer if i want a CD burner and don't have one. now, maybe apple has changed and i'm not up with the times. but irregardlessly, i severly dislike and avoid any company that insists on proprietary measures at any time. which is why i do, and probably always will, hate apple. |
|
|
![]() |
*mipadi* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
I wouldn't say music is the only thing keeping Apple alive. Its third quarter results (warning: PDF file) show that the music side of its business has been good, to the tune of about $1.9 billion; but its CPU sales made up $1.86 billion of its third-quarter profits. Throw in peripherals and software, and the non-music side of its business accounted for around $2.4 billion in sales in Q3 2006.
I don't mean to argue all the time, but there are a lot of inaccurate "facts" posted about Apple and the Macintosh. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |