9/11: conspiracy theories Options

[ryfitaDF]

watch this:
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=85019
(it probably won't work too well if you have dial-up)

i know it's 80 minutes long but it is very VERY interesting.

[NoSex]

Posted by me at one time, in another place:

Alright. To put this simply: This is quite possibly the most misrepresentative, dubious, vile, fallacious, inaccurate, and misleading pieces of documentary or expository film making I have ever seen. I remember seeing the original so long ago, and later this revision. Both are very much a joke in my eyes.

These videos can only be rivaled, in my opinion, by the likes of great prevaricative cheats and trickster nut-jobs such as Kent Hovind, Alex Jones, and the infamous David Vaughan Icke.

Despite Loose Change being a bit provocative, and slightly interesting, it is nothing but fantasy and, almost more commonly, a flat out lie.

On top of it all, the idea of a conspiracy this large and the reality and nature of demolition held up against a microscope are both impossible to fit into the situation and facts surrounding 9-11. A controlled demolition is alot of work, and takes alot of planning. It doesn't go unseen, or unheard. It's a sensitive issue, in which even a small fire would cause a chain reaction and cause an early explosition. In this case, we would be expecting over 60,000 pounds of ammunition, an impossible amount to sneak in and wire up for controlled demolition. Not to mention the risk in asking a demolition expert if they wouldn't mind wiring and blowing up a building with thousands and thousands of people in it for a few million bucks. Among the hundreds of other people that would have had to have been involved. It's just silly.

[cashmere deer]

Posted by me at one time, in another place:
On top of it all, the idea of a conspiracy this large and the reality and nature of demolition held up against a microscope are both impossible to fit into the situation and facts surrounding 9-11. A controlled demolition is alot of work, and takes alot of planning. It doesn't go unseen, or unheard. It's a sensitive issue, in which even a small fire would cause a chain reaction and cause an early explosition. In this case, we would be expecting over 60,000 pounds of ammunition, an impossible amount to sneak in and wire up for controlled demolition. Not to mention the risk in asking a demolition expert if they wouldn't mind wiring and blowing up a building with thousands and thousands of people in it for a few million bucks. Among the hundreds of other people that would have had to have been involved. It's just silly.

And it didn't. Hence the video. ;)

[NoSex]

And it didn't. Hence the video. ;)

Nothing you see in the video suggests in anyway the presence of a controlled demolition.
However, my comment was meant to point out that people moving in and our of the building every single day would notice the presence of ammunition within the building.