Environmentalism, right or wrong? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Environmentalism, right or wrong? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Jake - The Unholy Trinity / Premiscuous Poeteer. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,272 Joined: May 2006 Member No: 411,316 ![]() |
Now, when I say environmentalism, I'm dealing with the rainforest and what not. How do you guys feel about it? What's your stance on this topic?
If there has already been a thread about this, then whatever. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
carbon is most prevalently found in carbon dioxide.
it makes its way into diamonds and graphite through plants. i'm not ignoring basic chemestry- i'm assuming that there are living things on the earth, which form part of the carbon cycle. Carbon dioxide isn't locked up as such. look, scientists can't even explan everything about cloud formation. the most powerful comptuers in teh world are weather simulators- and yet no one can create one that works. The can't even predict el nino- which is the most significate weather phenomenon that effects the world, as of now. rather, it's specifics that scientists know. how clouds form, etc. things that can be tested. but it's the big things and the things that involve the whole world- like global warming- that leave scientists puzzled. why? you can't do experients. we've only got one earth. all you can do is observe- except you don't know the initial conditions and you don't know the variables. here's a mental excercise for you: tell me what is definatively good for the enviroment. and, if you care to try, tell me these general principles that govern weather. For instance- what causes el nino, and when's the next one coming? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |