Hate. |
Hate. |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() We are the cure. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,936 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,456 ![]() |
I hate how all of my favorite books are being ruined when they make it into a film. The Firm, Howl's Moving Castle, etc. They're just so bad, I can't ever stand to read it again.
THEY ARE DESTROYING LITERATURE!! |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Amberific. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,913 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 29,772 ![]() |
^ That and look at the Harry Potter franchise: they leave out J.K.'s little subtleties and minute plot twists because there are, quite frankly, a lot of them and it would take forever to make a movie. I mean, really, if the Harry Potter movies were exactly like the books, the movies would be about four to five hours long each. You gotta keep it simple so people don't get impatient and walk out the movies, or otherwise lost.
The problem with most movies that are based on literature is that they are way too ambitious. They take like, 700 page novels and then have to create a shorter, coherent whole for consumption. This is why, for the most part, they don't work. One recent movie that did work as an adaptation was Brokeback Mountain. It was based off of a short story by Annie Proulx, and because it was so short, the screenwriters and director had a lot to work with to tell a movie just over two hours long. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |