should we make the lounge an unmoderated forum? |
should we make the lounge an unmoderated forum? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() cb's #1 fan! =) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advisor Posts: 2,342 Joined: Nov 2003 Member No: 1 ![]() |
hi all,
i was browing through my old site before i made cb... and it had a forums, where the equivalent of cb's "the lounge" wasn't moderated. i thought that was a good idea, and leaning towards implementing it here. dont get me wrong. moderating is good and all, but sometimes it can really discourage members from participating. for example, there seems to be a trend where staff members close topics if the topic was talked about before, even if it's been over a year. this might be good in that it promotes organization, but in reality, it really kills the participitory aspect of the forums. sometimes things need to be revisted and retalked. its part of everyday life. if we continue on like this, where topics get closed because it revists an older topic, sooner or later, there will be nothing to talk about. period. so. what do you think? should we let the lounge be completely unmoderated by staff members? or should be do a compromise, where staff members are only allowed to move topics elsewhere, but cannot close the topics here? let me hear from you. staff members may also contribute. =) |
|
|
![]() |
*mipadi* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
I think that this idea's pretty good. :] See! My point has been demonstrated almost immediately! The weird thing about cB is that threads don't often go off-topic, at least not in interesting directions. Sure, you sometimes have a few cliques making inside jokes or having personal conversations, but I feel like threads never really have "discussion". Everyone just reads the first post, responds, then hardly return to the thread. Late posters rarely build on the statements and thoughts of other posters. The "discussion" hardly extends beyond the initial post.
I say it's "weird" because in other forums, people usually revisit threads fairly often and go off on "tangents" based on what other posters have said. I fully agree with taking a hands-off approach to managing threads on cB, but it would be best if people would actually read an entire thread and then make posts based on other posts that extend and evolve the conversation, rather than just answering the initial post. But that's just my $0.02. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |