Reasons for non approved graphics, Should there be a reason? Options

[*My Cinderella.*]

Sometimes when my graphics aren't accepted. I'd like to know the reason why they weren't accepted, so that I can work on it and know what not to do the next time I make a graphic. What do you guys think. Do you think they should state the reason why the graphics you made weren't accepted? It would be a lot easier if they did.

[*Libertie*]

Yeah, this was an issue before because there was no way to include a reason. That's why Jusun added the part at the end so if we decide to reject something, we can give a reason why.

However, maybe there should be some sort of form.. When a graphic is rejected and no reason is given, you get a PM that's like "Sorry to inform you, but your ____ has been rejected" or something like that. If you leave a reason, the only thing that sends is your message so most of the time it's like "The image quality is bad and the colors don't match." So then the person thinks you're just insulting the graphic and don't realize it's been rejected necessarily.

Instead, I think it should send the default letter and if someone includes a reason, it should say something like this at the end:

The moderator who reviewed your ____ also left the following reason(s) as to why it was rejected and how it can be improved:

And then there's the list. If that was the case, the moderator wouldn't have to worry about necessarily being nice, it could just say something like:

The moderator who reviewed your ____ also left the following reason(s) as to why it was rejected and how it can be improved:

- poor image quality
- colors don't match
- add some brushes or textures

See how it's not in complete sentences? And it's not filled with "Awww it's okay, keep trying really!" It took two seconds to write that up.

Just a thought.