The Problem of Free Will, A Theological Problem. |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
The Problem of Free Will, A Theological Problem. |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
Alright, the purpose of this thread is to discuss the theological Problem of Free Will. So, under common christian theolgy, God is described as being all-knowing (omniscient) and all powerful (omnipotent). Men are also described as having free will. This is at the heart of the reality of theological fatalism. Solving this issue is vital to christian theology as it becomes an inherent contradiction as well as threatening to the christian conception of salvation and damnation.
I hold that God's infallible foreknowledge makes impossible man's free will. If god knows the future, how can we choose our own path? Discuss. |
|
|
![]() |
*disco infiltrator* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
But how could he not use it? If "everything happens according to God's plan", how could he not be using his omniscience? If you know something, there's no way you can't...use it. You know it anyway. You can't make yourself forget.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 ![]() |
But how could he not use it? If "everything happens according to God's plan", how could he not be using his omniscience? If you know something, there's no way you can't...use it. You know it anyway. You can't make yourself forget. yes you can. you're omnipotent. and if you do, you arent omniscient. and if you cant, you arent omnipotent. ergo, no god. |
|
|
*CrackedRearView* |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Guest ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 ![]() |
Your point seemed obvious enough to me. well,yeah, obviously. but your response didnt fit... two of the stipulations nate pointed out were omniscience and omnipotence. i was saying the two can cancel themselves out. saying ther could be a god, but we dont have free wilkl didnt make sense to me as a repsonse to the whole post |
|
|
![]() ![]() |