Environment vs. Economy |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Environment vs. Economy |
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
All right, so since I want to see a different topic out there...this one's from February's Lincoln-Douglas topic:
Resolved: A government's obligation to protect the environment ought to take precedence over its obligation to promote economic development. I'm on the negative side for this, seeing that only by providing a healthy, stable economy can you be able to help the environment. The products of a good economy are what help improve the environment. Haha don't worry...I have more points...I've researched both sides to this, so bring it on. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Dark Lord of McCandless ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,226 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 16,761 ![]() |
QUOTE(uninspiredfae @ May 22 2004, 4:30 PM) Actually, you buy stock, you would own part of that stock market. Not the economy of stock, because there's no such thing. The economy is ALL goods produced, and consumed in a given geographic area. I can control part of it. If I control the supply of say, cheap pens, then I can restrict your consumption of them--thus restricting your participation in the economy. The market IS the economy. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |