Environment vs. Economy |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Environment vs. Economy |
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
All right, so since I want to see a different topic out there...this one's from February's Lincoln-Douglas topic:
Resolved: A government's obligation to protect the environment ought to take precedence over its obligation to promote economic development. I'm on the negative side for this, seeing that only by providing a healthy, stable economy can you be able to help the environment. The products of a good economy are what help improve the environment. Haha don't worry...I have more points...I've researched both sides to this, so bring it on. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,795 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 16,421 ![]() |
QUOTE i agree with u, grace... im not that outdoor kind of girl... i think environment shud be first like wat grace said.. it's so slow to get all environment back to its original place... and for like economoy.. as once u lose it u can get it back by jus rebuilding it with other many tools... in environment there are no tools to make something up fast. So considering the half a trillion dollar deficit we currently have, you suggest FURTHER spending on the environment and adding to that deficit? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |