Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

is jordan brand socially irresponsble?
yo pusha
post Feb 15 2006, 01:09 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 766
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 308,296



we all heard the stories. kids getting shot for jordans. riots at jordan releases. employees stealing jordans from their stores to sell on ebay. etc.

the markup resell value on the recent "DMP" release is more than 250%. worldwide, jordan brand only produced 11,000 pairs, a pathetic ammount. there were numerous riots, but thankfully no deaths.

is jordan brand wrong for producing such a limited ammount of their product and allowing this to happen? or is it the consumers fault for buying into this hype? also, is jordan brand fiscally irresponsible? debate!
 
 
Start new topic
Replies
demolished
post Feb 17 2006, 09:28 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
*******

Group:
Posts: 8,274
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,001



It's the people's fault. They chose to behave that way. They're greedy, PICKY, ignorant, childish, and have no respect. They don’t control themselves from what they want. Why would it be Jordan’s fault?

There are other things that people can buy plus it’s cheaper!
 
yo pusha
post Feb 17 2006, 11:46 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 766
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 308,296



QUOTE(Spiritual Winged Aura @ Feb 17 2006, 6:28 PM) *
Why would it be Jordan’s fault?

materialism is not the only reason people buy these. some people buy for financial gain (reselling) and some buy as an investment (collecting). jordan brand is exploiting the consumer by producing such a small amount that some people are so desperate for a pair that they will stop at nothing to get one. jordan brand is fully aware of this and does nothing to prevent this. i think that is wrong..
 

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: