The study of philosophy, What's the point? |
The study of philosophy, What's the point? |
*mipadi* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
I'm one of the opinions editors on my college newspaper (awesome job, by the way—I highly recommend it). We recently picked up a new writer, who (thankfully) wrote an article this week.
The article is about the study of philosophy. In a discussion with this young man, I found that he had transferred to my university from the Tisch School of the Arts at New York University. He had been a film student; he was now studying philosophy—against his parents' wishes, he stressed. His article was essentially a justification of the study of philosophy, which at first glance seems so highly abstracted as to be utterly pointless. But is it? The young man made a very good point: The study of philosophy is one that lends itself well to any course of study. It not only emphasizes, but forces, creative thinking—a quality that helps in any field of study, for no one has gotten anywhere by thinking inside the box all of the time. I'm a computer science student, but I've taken a number of philosophy courses. I neither major nor minor in philosophy; its study is just a hobby of mine, if you will. But I've found that it is helpful in other coursework. Take computer science, for example—no scientist, or even entrepreneur in the field of computing, has ever gotten anywhere without creative thinking. Some of the historical figures I respect the most are the scientists from the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries, especially Isaac Newton. At the time, the field of science was relatively new; it was, in fact, referred to not as science, but as "natural philosophy", with men like Newton being known as "natural philosophers". As the name suggests, these researchers were not purely scientists—their study had a grounding in philosophy as well. Men like Newton were smart and capable not because they merely studied things around them, but because they new what questions to ask—and knew how to go about finding the answer. I've found that the biggest factor in intelligence is knowing what question to ask to find an answer. It is through such divining that one truly learns and develops an understanding; thus, asking questions is the key to learning. And there is the keystone of this young opinions writer's argument: The study of philosophy aids greatly in teaching one what questions need to be asked. So what are your thoughts? Is philosophy an integral part of any student's study, or is it an unnecessary, even pointless, distraction to things that really matter? |
|
|
![]() |
*tweeak* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
QUOTE(mipadi @ Feb 15 2006, 9:58 AM) So what are your thoughts? Is philosophy an integral part of any student's study, or is it an unnecessary, even pointless, distraction to things that really matter? What exactly "really matters"? I personally find math too be a useless asset of my studies, and yet I'm required to take that, even though I think philosophy would be gernarally a good deal more beneficial. Philosophical principles can actually be applied to many aspects of life and give you new perspective, whereas more analytical subjects have little value if you don't intend to spend your life working complex equations. If the goal is to, for lack of better phrasing, think better, then then philosophy should really be considered far more meaningful, as it enhances knowledge as well as critical thinking, which is a skill far too many people lack. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |