that's it. |
that's it. |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() oooh yeah. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,333 Joined: Feb 2006 Member No: 376,533 ![]() |
You know what? f**k cB3. cB is perfectly fine without all this reorganization and crap. Some of our most promising subforums were deleted because of lovely Jusun. We did not need to rid ourselves of the Health, Cars or Current Events forums. I know Michael is trying to appease everyone by saying that they may come back, but let's face it; unless we start something, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO COME BACK. Jusun doesn't even come on these forums anymore; why the f**k is he making the decisions? Okay, he founded the site. That's all fine and dandy, but what about what the active members want? I unregistered because createBlog was turning into a bunch of rule Nazis and ass kissers.
But I actually gave a damn and came back for this one post. We're not asking for these forums back, we're DEMANDING them back, ¿comprende? You talk this little reorganization thing to death, I don't care. But we demand those subforums back. -Radhika |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Don't wake ghostie. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 3,546 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 2,405 ![]() |
We should realize that this a transition period, it won't last forever.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 ![]() |
QUOTE(Retrogressive @ Feb 14 2006, 7:50 AM) no, but it was entered intoin haste, with the removal of subforums without adequate consultation. and someone pointed out the bylaws as evidence of member input. yup. input. but NO OUTPUT TO MATCH. as far as i know, the last time jusun so much as looked at that forum was when he gave me and justin permission to appoint the original members of the bylaws staff. apparently, what we're waiting for is approval... if he is looking without posting, he would stil have had plenty of time to get round to this. furthermore, so could mona and christina. the probelm isnt a lack fo member input, it is a lack of results stemming from this input |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Don't wake ghostie. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 3,546 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 2,405 ![]() |
QUOTE(racoons > you @ Feb 14 2006, 8:03 AM) no, but it was entered intoin haste, with the removal of subforums without adequate consultation. and someone pointed out the bylaws as evidence of member input. yup. input. but NO OUTPUT TO MATCH. as far as i know, the last time jusun so much as looked at that forum was when he gave me and justin permission to appoint the original members of the bylaws staff. apparently, what we're waiting for is approval... if he is looking without posting, he would stil have had plenty of time to get round to this. furthermore, so could mona and christina. the probelm isnt a lack fo member input, it is a lack of results stemming from this input I do completely agree. A lot of people are saying, "We're working on this." but when it comes to something they wanted done such as the creation of certain murdered forums it was very quick response. But we have no possible way of knowing what happens backstage and what the mods and admins are planning. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |