Guns, who should be able to own them? Options

[*NatiMarie*]

We all know that guns can cause harm, they're everywhere darnit!

Primarily, who can own them? Who shouldn't own them?

[EmeraldKnight]

You said law enforcement. When the government breaks the law, as it already has, it technically justifies armed enforcement of the Constitutin, just as if someone steals a pen, even though it doesn't do any real harm, we still prosecute

I wasnt the one to mention law enforcement..someone else brought that up, but anyways.. how has the government broken the law? you havent stated specifically yet..

Alright and 1. I love your Rome analogy, its very well written but 2. it shoudnt apply here

Of course, there are practical problems to overthrowing the government every other day, but the fact remains that SOONER OR LATER, government will progress to the stage when armed rebellion is the only solution... This is what has happened with EVERY SINGLE REPUBLIC in history, including our own. That's why in the Declaration there's a clause that says some times you ahve to tolerate a LITTLE oppressive government, but when it gets so bad that there's no longer any nway to stop it using legal means, then armed force is an acceptable means to do so.

I still dont see how you can be so sure that our government will reach that point.. i mean.. simply because it happened in the past doesnt mean that it'll happen again..

We cant prepare for everything that might possibly happen, its just not practical